How many patches can be applied to a product in a single Windows command line?
trying to install 4 patches for a product on a single command line. but the unversioned files are not being replaced.
therefore, you need to know if there are any limitations in applying patches on a single command line.
for example: msiexec / p "a.msp; b.msp; c.msp; d.msp" / qb
Hello, I found an old computer and decided to fix it since the only problem I tracked down is that the hard drive inside it was hardly damaged. After a week waiting for a new hard drive, I discovered a really strange problem, which even happened to my laptop, but I was able to really fix it simply with a choice in BIOS (I can't remember what it's called), back then when I was Looking for the equal / similar option in the computer BIOS, I did not find it and it still does not let me in the Windows installer to use the hard disk with a message saying that the hard disk may be disabled in the BIOS. When I put my SSD in the computer, it will be detected correctly, same as in the laptop, but it won't boot, so can someone help me locate the problem please? + Please don't close this, I want to give away the computer and I can't find any other platform where anyone can help me except this one.
If you connect to a network device, such as a NAS that hosts backup images in this case, via the UNC path \ 192.1.1.10 and enter the credentials to connect, the connection will be added to your NET USE list. , which means you can reconnect to the same route later without having to enter your credentials again.
Is there a way to prevent this from happening, or force the server to delete the corresponding network session as soon as the browser window is closed?
Note: I'm not talking about cached credentials here, I'm talking about the session being added to NET USE which, unless removed, will allow you to go back to the same path without credentials.
I changed my domain password, so after that my Microsoft computers stopped working.
I tried to go to Credential Manager to remove all credentials
about Teams (as advised by Microsoft's support page) but nothing.
I tried clearing the Microsoft Teams cache in this folder:
C: Users MyUser AppData Roaming Microsoft Teams Cache
But nothing.
When I try to access Microsoft Teams I have this message:
Can you log in again? Sorry for any inconvenience. Sign in now
But when I click "Sign in now" a blue circle starts but the loopo is infinite.
I don't know how to solve this problem.
My O.S. it is Windows 7 Professional with S.P.1 on 64-bit PC
I have been trying to fix an error message on our Server 2008 RDS server farm for about 3 weeks and am getting nowhere. Randomly Outlook 2016 freezes and freezes. Sometimes it recovers and the user can continue with his work and other times he bombards and throws the user completely out of Outlook.
From what I can see it creates an event log id of 1000. Application error 1000
Faulting application name: OUTLOOK.EXE, version: 16.0.4966.1000, time stamp: 0x5e205f31
Faulting module name: OUTLOOK.EXE, version: 16.0.4966.1000, time stamp: 0x5e205f31
Exception code: 0xc0000005
Failure compensation: 0x0000000000bd5aa0
Identification of the process with errors: 0x7a00
Failed application start time: 0x01d60c1f44f8c35d
Wrong application path: C: Program Files Microsoft Office Office16 OUTLOOK.EXE
Faulting module path: C: Program Files Microsoft Office Office16 OUTLOOK.EXE
Report ID: e8ed2ff4-781a-11ea-85f0-005056a21772
The servers are completely up to date, I have reinstalled Office, I run registry cleaners. The only thing I have not done is delete Office, run sfc / scan and reinstall Office.
The mistake is common with all 6 RDS servers, so I am reluctant to do it now.
I am in the midst of building our new RDS environment, but it has been discontinued, for obvious reasons. Very frustrating! Any help is appreciated.
Usually I change the brightness of my laptop with:
Fn + Home / / The end: Increase / decrease screen
brightness
and it works well
However, ~ 50% of the time, after a sleep / resume, brightness is stuck at current level and I can no longer adjust it with the Fn+ … keyboard shortcut.
Also, adjusting the brightness slider here has no effect (it generally works!):
The only solution is to restart the computer, and then after this it is possible to change the brightness.
Why did this happened? How to solve this little problem?
I have a kind of chicken and egg delimma. Yesterday, suddenly, my Dell XPS 15 did not boot properly and displayed the error "The digital signature of this file could not be verified …". What increases my problem is that I forgot my administrator password (only account on this machine) since I have been using fingerprints for more than 2 years. However, I can no longer get to the fingerprint screen with this boot error. This is what I tried:
A lot of software, such as Notepad ++, pgAdmin 4, and Bisq, which are open source and free, with no attempts to install malware / espionage in the installer, make it unnecessarily annoying to update them.
Instead of just seeing a message like:
There is a new version available: 1.2.3. You are currently running 1.2.2. Update now? (Yes) (No)
And then just update by pressing "Yes" …
Instead, they bother you because an update is available, but when you accept, download a new installer, or even load a web page where you need to download the installer manually. Either way, once you run this new installer, it treats you as a "first time client", just like the initial install, causing you to look at a GUI and manually click "next" multiple times for no reason apparent.
Why wouldn't it, since it's already installed on the computer, detect this (or start with a tick like "/ update") and just update instead of showing the useless GUI installer stuff I already went through when I installed originally the software?
For software developed by prickly companies, the reason is obvious: they have another chance to trick you into forgetting to disable their toolbars / spyware / malware by making the checkbox pre-ticked again. However, again I am talking about these FOSS programs that do not use such tactics.
There is no logical or technical reason for this that you can think of. It is as if they "punish" the user by making us do useless work to waste our time and energy. After going through this for over 20 years, I'm absolutely exhausted from manually dealing with update after update after update, and I can't believe they haven't automated this obvious and simple thing after all this time, instead of passing it by. your users over and over again
This practice greatly discourages updating, and many times I've stuck with old versions for a long time just because I can't deal with clicking another meaningless installer.
And no, I don't want to use and trust any third party software "Chocolatey". I wonder why real software developers do this.
And no, this does not require more work in any way for developers. Again, I'm talking about how the installer shows up and makes me go through useless steps for no reason, since the software is already installed, and all the installer ends up doing is copying the new files to my existing installation directory. There is no reason for me to do this, because the software is already installed and you clearly know what to do, as I can click "Next" multiple times and then update.
The problem is that the installer shows this nonsense, since it is an update and not a "new installation".
Why do they insist on doing this?
From a Hyper-V guest running Debian 10, I installed VPN software and connected to the VPN server.
How can I use the connection my VM client is making with some of the applications running on the host operating system (Windows 10)?
Here is a graphical representation of what I am trying to achieve:
I've seen similar questions, but none specifically addressed Hyper-V.
I would like to ask you whether or not you have a program to determine if the tested computer supports RDSEED and RDRAND instructions