license | Web Hosting Talk
‘);
var sidebar_align = ‘right’;
var content_container_margin = parseInt(‘350px’);
var sidebar_width = parseInt(‘330px’);
//–>
I’m writing my first CF stacks and I’m running into failed deploys on the first try of course because I don’t know the syntax and available parameters yet fully. I am validating my json and the template itself via the CLI but it can still run into issues at deployment and cause a rollback or failure. Now when it’s a brand new stack and not an update, the deployment just fails and I can’t update it, I have to completely destroy the stack and redeploy it brand new.
I was wondering how to go about this issue. Even tho the deleted stack is not in the console, the CLI will still list all of the stacks that have been created and destroyed previously and it’s just not clean. I can’t update the stack of course after fixing the issue that caused it to fail because it’s in the failed state, I have to redeploy everything as if it was a completely new stack.
Any thoughts on this? How did you go about creating your first stacks?
Team site collection with publishing features enabled.
Inside the Team site collection home page I added multiple content search web parts (6 content search web parts).
When users with Edit or Contribute permission access the home page they can view the content search web-parts without any problems.
When users with Read permission, access the page they will get the following error, one each of the 6 content search web parts:
If I grant this user Edit permission then he can view the webpart, and if I grant him Read permission back the problem will occur again. also I have noted that when users with Read permission do a hard refresh for the browser “CTRL + F5” they can view the results, but if they navigate back to the page, they will receive the same error?
Here is the logs, where the page which will show the error is http://www.tgroup.intra:80/my%20dash/SitePages/Home.aspx:
10/18/2016 18:50:47.02 w3wp.exe (0x23F0) 0x2660 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication amge7 Medium SPFederationAuthenticationModule.IsRedirectToLogOnPage: Detected a redirection but the redirect is not to a known signin page: http://www.tgroup.intra/my dash/SitePages/Home.aspx 79b1ae9d-0cce-c0b7-30fc-0e3f1815a827
10/18/2016 18:50:47.02 w3wp.exe (0x23F0) 0x1590 SharePoint Foundation Request Management adc7v Medium Reverse mapping URI from 'http://www.tgroup.intra/my dash/SitePages/Home.aspx' to 'http://www.tgroup.intra/my%20dash/SitePages/Home.aspx' 79b1ae9d-0cce-c0b7-30fc-0e3f1815a827
10/18/2016 18:50:47.02 w3wp.exe (0x23F0) 0x1590 SharePoint Foundation Micro Trace uls4 Medium Micro Trace Tags: 0 nasq,0 adc7u,16 adc7v 79b1ae9d-0cce-c0b7-30fc-0e3f1815a827
10/18/2016 18:50:47.02 w3wp.exe (0x23F0) 0x1590 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring b4ly Medium Leaving Monitored Scope (Request (GET:http://www.tgroup.intra/my dash)). Execution Time=18.1161292845878 79b1ae9d-0cce-c0b7-30fc-0e3f1815a827
10/18/2016 18:50:47.02 w3wp.exe (0x23F0) 0x1590 SharePoint Foundation Claims Authentication amge7 Medium SPFederationAuthenticationModule.IsRedirectToLogOnPage: Detected a redirection but the redirect is not to a known signin page: http://www.tgroup.intra/my%20dash/SitePages/Home.aspx 79b1ae9d-0cce-c0b7-30fc-0e3f1815a827
10/18/2016 18:50:47.14 w3wp.exe (0x23F0) 0x11DC SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Request (GET:http://www.tgroup.intra/my dash/SitePages/Home.aspx)). Parent No
10/18/2016 18:50:47.14 w3wp.exe (0x23F0) 0x11DC SharePoint Foundation Logging Correlation Data xmnv Medium Name=Request (GET:http://www.tgroup.intra/my dash/SitePages/Home.aspx) 79b1ae9d-ccd6-c0b7-30fc-0cc9c8b54620
10/18/2016 18:50:47.14 w3wp.exe (0x23F0) 0x11DC SharePoint Foundation Request Management adc7u Medium Mapping URI from 'http://www.tgroup.intra:80/my%20dash/SitePages/Home.aspx' to 'http://sps01/my%20dash/SitePages/Home.aspx' 79b1ae9d-ccd6-c0b7-30fc-0cc9c8b54620
10/18/2016 18:50:47.14 w3wp.exe (0x23F0) 0x4720 SharePoint Foundation Monitoring nasq Medium Entering monitored scope (Request (GET:http://www.tgroup.intra:80/my%20dash/SitePages/Home.aspx)). Parent No
EDIT
After hours of investigation i try changing the Loading Behavior for the content search web part from “Sync option: Issue query from the server. ” to “Async option: Issue query from the browser“. and the error is almost done. it will appear but in very less frequent !!
So now i am totally confused on the relation between; The Loading Behavior & READ/EDIT permission & the “Sorry, something went wrong” Error??
SOCKS Proxy List by Tisocks.net If you Need Socks5 , Please visit service and add fund via PM , BTC WMZ . Thanks all!! Add fund : https://tisocks.net/addfund Check socks5 Online here : https://checksocks5.com LIVE | 113.108.94.25:38801 | 1.866 | SOCKS5 | Unknow | Unknow | | Unknow | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 51.81.31.61:16028 | 0.462 | SOCKS5 | Ohio | 44134 | ip72-196-155-211.cl.ri.cox.net | United States | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 104.236.26.27:38801 | 0.858 | SOCKS5 | New York | 10118 | Digital Ocean | United States | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 206.81.2.118:1080 | 0.368 | SOCKS5 | Unknow | Unknow | | Unknow | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 51.81.31.61:34423 | 0.432 | SOCKS5 | Texas | 75025 | Frontier Communications | United States | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 139.99.104.233:10879 | 4.547 | SOCKS5 | Unknow | Unknow | | Unknow | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 185.153.198.210:54471 | 0.431 | SOCKS5 | Unknow | Unknow | mail.palora.top | Germany | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 167.172.176.157:1080 | 0.247 | SOCKS5 | Hesse | 60313 | Digital Ocean | Germany | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 66.110.216.221:39603 | 2.765 | SOCKS5 | Unknow | Unknow | | Unknow | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 51.81.31.61:34882 | 0.557 | SOCKS5 | California | 91340 | cpe-23-241-34-119.socal.res.rr.com | United States | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 162.243.108.129:1080 | 0.312 | SOCKS5 | Unknow | Unknow | | Unknow | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 174.76.35.7:36171 | 1.906 | SOCKS5 | New York | 10001 | Cox Communications | United States | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 208.97.31.229:53124 | 2.504 | SOCKS5 | Georgia | 31707 | Georgia Public Web | United States | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 193.164.222.70:1080 | 1.505 | SOCKS5 | Unknow | Unknow | Power Line Datacenter | Unknow | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 150.107.50.67:8080 | 1.361 | SOCKS5 | Unknow | Unknow | | Unknow | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 183.234.24.70:1081 | 1.079 | SOCKS5 | Guangdong | Unknow | China Mobile Guangdong | China | Checked at https://tisocks.net LIVE | 208.97.31.13:53100 | 0.647 | SOCKS5 | Georgia | 31707 | Georgia Public Web | United States | Checked at https://tisocks.net
tisocks
Reviewed by tisocks on
.
[Tisocks.net] – Socks5 Proxy Service Cheap Socks5 SOCKS Proxy List by Tisocks.net
If you Need Socks5 , Please visit service and add fund via PM , BTC WMZ . Thanks all!!
Add fund : https://tisocks.net/addfund
Check socks5 Online here : https://checksocks5.com
LIVE | 113.108.94.25:38801 | 1.866 | SOCKS5 | Unknow | Unknow | | Unknow | Checked at https://tisocks.net
LIVE | 51.81.31.61:16028 | 0.462 | SOCKS5 | Ohio | 44134 | ip72-196-155-211.cl.ri.cox.net | United States | Checked at https://tisocks.net
LIVE | 104.236.26.27:38801 | 0.858 |
Rating: 5
Please Message me BEFORE placing order to discuss your project.
I will design and develop fully dynamic & responsive Website or Landing Page for you that will be eye catching, responsive, Google-friendly at affordable rates.
I am a Website Developer having 3+ years of professional experience in this Industry. My focus is customer satisfaction, precision, accuracy and quick services.
Why Hire Me?
100% Client Satisfaction Guaranteed,
3+ years’ experience in Web Design and development,
I recently made an account on Hetzner.com I didn’t get any ID Verification pop ups as my **friend got** my friend then wanted to make an account as well, he said he wouldn’t send his ID.
Why didn’t I get the verification and why he is getting the verification request?
according to some expert in hosting, my web page was not active in the internet (¿?) This person asked me about how did I get my domain www.el-emboscador.com from Namecheap. I explained him that before to get it I was www.example.blogspot.com from Blogger. Then, he said that because of that now I did not have a hosting service. I got the hosting service from him (Hosty.cl) and now, after 10 days that Namecheap changed the DNS info, the only thing I get when I write www.example.com on the bar is: Default Web Site Page Sorry!
I have tried everything but my ignorance in these matters is too much superior to the problem
Please, do what you can do as soon as you can. Thank you very much
Consider a scenario where Client 1 wants to share information with Client 2 over a network fully monitored by a state actor, and achieve that communication while hiding:
what each party sent.
what target party each other party intended to communicate with.
Tor attempts to achieve this, however if the state actor hosts enough nodes of its own, it can create a high enough probability of hosting each party’s connection to eventually identify the parties communicating.
To avoid this vulnerability:
Client 1 and Client 2 share a private encryption key in some manner that escapes the notice of the state actor, even if that means a physical exchange of USB drives.
Then they connect to a node which waits for millions of requests to occur, each containing encrypted information to be communicated, bundles it all together, and sends the entire bundle of information back to every client involved.
Client 1 and 2 then attempt to decrypt every item in the bundle until they successfully decrypt the information created with their private key.
The monitoring state actor would not be able to determine which client communicated with which other client, nor what anyone communicated, so long as they shared their keys privately. Even if the state actor took over the Privacy Node, it could only know which clients attempted to connect to it, not what they sent nor who they intended to communicate with. Nor could it spoof any response to the clients without knowing their keys.
Is there a flaw in the concept I’m considering? If so, what?
Has anyone used HostPapa? | Web Hosting Talk
‘);
var sidebar_align = ‘right’;
var content_container_margin = parseInt(‘350px’);
var sidebar_width = parseInt(‘330px’);
//–>
Has anyone used HostPapa?
I’m looking for a fully managed VPS host for some wordpress sites – has anyone hosted with Hostpapa?
