[Get] Vintage publishing profits | Proxies123.com

[​IMG]

Sale page:
Code:

Code:

http://amydebcreations.com/go/vpp-z/

Get it here ->
Code:

Hidden content:

You must respond before you can see the hidden data contained here.

This is a mirror link so you can choose the download locations. It's my favorite for smaller files.

This is my first part, so I hope I've done everything right.

In fact, I was wrong with the title, so I had to delete it and try again. :RE

vintage – No1 Pocket Kodak opening 1 to 4, f equivalent stop?

I have a cute little pocket Kodak from the twenties or thirties. It is the bottom of the range model with the "single lens". The opening is not marked in numbers f, but is labeled as 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Is there any way to know the equivalent opening of the number f to measure the exposures with the modern and fast film (Ilford Delta 400)?

I would like to use a 35mm camera as a meter, and decipher a conversion for the vintage camera. The most expensive cameras in the same range have lenses f7.9 and f6.3, so I guess it's higher than that. But I could imagine that a cheap one-element lens was quite bright, but sacrificing sharpness.

No.1 pocket Kodak lens and opening controls

I've done a lot of searching on Google, but I have not found anything. It seems that the other models in the range may have been more common than the "single lens".

I have the original manual, which includes 3 exposure tables for the 3 different lens options (individual, "Kodar f.7.9" and "Kodak Anastigmat f.6.3"), the page for the single lens is reproduced here. However, I realize that the films of the time were quite slow, so this is likely to over-expose the modern movie.

No.1 pocket Kodak single lens exposure guide

Other details of the camera. It takes 120 movies, and it seems to work. I executed an Ilford FP4 roll out of date, and I got 4 or 5 really good images, but I was guessing and exposing exhibitions in full sunlight. I think it says more about the latitude of the movie than my ability with the camera.

The plate that surrounds the lens with the shutter and opening marks has the number "27449".

If you are wondering why the bellows look strange in the photo, it is because they have some light leaks, so I put them in a black paper "vest" that seems to block them enough.

I have a new Ilford Delta 400, and I hope to take portraits with natural light indoors (a very well lit room), the same conditions with a 35mm camera, with a cheap f3.9 lens with Ilford FP4, 125 ASA has not had problems.

Interestingly, the opening is in front of the shutter, which are both in front of the lens element. When holding a ruler and squinting, I assume that the opening in setting 1 is about 8 mm in diameter, and in the setting of 4 about 2 mm.

Vintage lens meter on a Nikon digital SLR?

I'm interested in getting a Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Electric MC S 135mm f / 3.5 lens, but I'm wondering if this lens will measure on a DSLR, specifically the Nikon D7100.

Do vintage lenses measure on a Nikon digital SLR?

I'm interested in getting a Carl Zeiss Jena DDR Electric MC S 135mm f / 3.5 lens, but I'm wondering if this lens will measure on a DSLR, specifically the Nikon D7100.

Team identification – What brand is this vintage tripod?

This is pure speculation, but maybe the brand is "GOIN", Goin or something similar? Looking for "goin tripod uk", I found several links to outdated Amazon.co.uk and eBay products (unfortunately, without product images, hoping to find brand logos):

Other brands announced for "Q-666C Tripod" are Afaith, Zomei, Supon, QZSD (Quingzhangshedai), and others.

Based on the recent existence of branded tripods that are sold on Amazon.co.uk, I am going to assume that Goin / GOIN was a brand of photography accessories in the UK that, like many other brands, was acquired at some point by a Chinese. Company in the last 20 years.

vintage vivitar lens and what adapter to use for the Sony E-mount

This is a lens from the Vivitar T4 or TX series. The T4 and TX lenses are interesting because they were designed to be agnostic mount; that is, they have interchangeable mounting adapters, so you could move your lens to bodies with different mounts, simply by obtaining the appropriate Vivitar T4 / TX adapter.

As the answer of Gabe Krause indicates, this particular The lens has the Miranda mounting adapter on it. You can obtain a Miranda lens for the Sony E mounting adapter economically.

Alternatively, especially if you already have adapters to mount other lenses on the body of your Sony E mount, look for sites such as eBay for the Vivitar T4 (or TX) mount (any adapter you already have). You can "convert" your Vivitar lens to that mount, so you'll use the third-party Sony E mount adapter, which means you'll have to carry a less adapter.

Convert the vintage lens into a digital camera

I have a Canon Rebel EOS Rebel sl1 100D camera. I have an older lens from Sigma APO 170-500. Can it be used in the digital camera with an adapter and what adapter? I've searched everywhere and, frankly, I do not have enough experience to understand most of what I'm reading, except what I can do, but autofocus will not work. I do not want to ruin my camera and I can not find anywhere what adapter it would be if I tried to do this. Anybody's help would be appreciated. Thank you

Old lenses: which vintage lens frame is best suited for EOS cameras?

Forget about using Canon FD lenses on EOS cameras. You can not get infinite focus with those lenses without adding additional lenses. This is because at 42 mm, the FD mount has a shorter recording distance (a / k / a focal length of the flange) than the 44 mm of the EF mount. If you insist on using non-EF lenses in EOS cameras, lenses made for mounts with longer recording distances than EF lenses will be preferred. The support for Minolta A of 44.5 mm is out due to mechanical space problems. The same goes for the Olympus OM mount. That leaves Nikon F and Pentax K as the most likely candidates.

However, you will still give up a lot when you use a Nikon F or Pentax K lens instead of a native Canon EF lens.

I never recommend adapting cross-brand lenses² when there is a native lens for a particular mount available. YMMV

If you are using an AOS-C EOS camera, the EF-S 24mm f / 2.8 STM sells for about $ 130 new from authorized dealers.
If you are using an FF EOS camera, the EF28mm f / 2.8 costs $ 470.

Some third-party lenses in the Canon EF mount (for both APS-C and full mount):
Yongnuo 35mm f / 2 (with AF) – $ 90
Samyang (Rokinon) 24 mm f / 1.4 (MF) – $ 380

¹ These additional optics also act as moderate teleconverters, which override the stated purpose of a fast and wide-angle lens. TC makes a lens longer and slower.
² Something like EOS EF to EOS-M is a bit different, since both mounts use the same protocols, the only difference is the RD.

Which vintage lens frame is best suited for EOS cameras?

Forget about using Canon FD lenses on EOS cameras. You can not get infinite focus with those lenses without adding additional lenses. This is because at 42 mm, the FD mount has a shorter recording distance (a / k / at the focal length of the flange) than the 44 mm of the EF mount. If you insist on using non-EF lenses in EOS cameras, lenses made for mounts with longer recording distances than EF lenses will be preferred. The support for Minolta A of 44.5 mm is out due to mechanical space problems. The same goes for the Olympus OM mount. That leaves Nikon F and Pentax K as the most likely candidates.

However, you will still give up a lot when you use a Nikon F or Pentax K lens instead of a native Canon EF lens.

I never recommend adapting cross-brand lenses² when there is a native lens for a particular mount available. YMMV

If you are using an AOS-C EOS camera, the EF-S 24mm f / 2.8 STM sells for about $ 130 new from authorized dealers.
If you are using an FF EOS camera, the EF28mm f / 2.8 costs $ 470.

Some third-party lenses in the Canon EF mount (for both APS-C and full mount):
Yongnuo 35mm f / 2 (with AF) – $ 90
Samyang (Rokinon) 24 mm f / 1.4 (MF) – $ 380

¹ These additional optics also act as moderate teleconverters, which override the stated purpose of a fast and wide-angle lens. TC makes a lens longer and slower.
² Something like EOS EF to EOS-M is a bit different, since both mounts use the same protocols, the only difference is the RD.