magento 2.0.7 – Some modules use code versions newer or older than the database. First update the module code, then run & # 39; setup: upgrade & # 39;

The code base of the module does not match the DB schema and data.
Magento_Theme scheme: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Magento_Theme data: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Magento client schema: 2.0.9 -> 2.0.6
Magento client data: 2.0.9 -> 2.0.6
Diagram of Magento_Cms: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Data of Magento_Cms: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Magento registration scheme: 2.1.3 -> 2.0.3
Magento catalog data: 2.1.3 -> 2.0.3
Magento_Search scheme: 2.0.4 -> 2.0.1
Magento_Search data: 2.0.4 -> 2.0.1
Schematic of Magento_Quote: 2.0.3 -> 2.0.2
Data of the Magento appointment: 2.0.3 -> 2.0.2
Schema Magento_Msrp: 2.1.3 -> 2.0.0
Magento_Msrp data: 2.1.3 -> 2.0.0
Magento_Bundle scheme: 2.0.2 -> 2.0.1
Magento_Bundle data: 2.0.2 -> 2.0.1
Downloadable Magento schema: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Magento_Downloadable data: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Magento sales scheme: 2.0.3 -> 2.0.1
Magento sales data: 2.0.3 -> 2.0.1
Diagram Magento_CatalogInventory: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Magento_CatalogInventory data: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Schematic of Magento_GroupedProduct: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Magento_GroupedProduct data: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Magento integration scheme: 2.2.0 -> 2.0.1
Magento integration data: 2.2.0 -> 2.0.1
Schema Magento_CatalogRule: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Data of Magento_CatalogRule: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Schema Magento_SalesRule: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Magento_SalesRule data: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Schema Magento_Swatches: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Magento_Swatches data: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Schema Magento_GiftMessage: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Magento_GiftMessage data: 2.0.1 -> 2.0.0
Some modules use code versions that are newer or older than the database. First update the module code, then run & # 39; setup: upgrade & # 39 ;.

Remote access – Grouping different versions of the kernel

After a bit of trial and error, I managed to group two OS X machines. The master is running Mathematica 9.0 and the secondary 11.0. Everything was fine, the remote control was

ssh -x -f -l nwalton treebeard.local "/ Applications / Mathematica
11.app/Contents/MacOS/WolframKernel "-mathlink -linkmode Connect 4
-name of the link & # 39;two& # 39; -subkernel -noinit

To get additional performance in the short term, I got a trial version of 11.3 on a third machine with the same remote command, save for host names and start

ssh -x -f -l install install.local "/ Applications / Mathematica
11.app/Contents/MacOS/WolframKernel "-mathlink -linkmode Connect 4
-name of the link & # 39;two& # 39; -subkernel -noinit

The third machine executes Mathematica standalone fine, but when I add it to the cluster, the master executes 9.0 reports

LaunchKernels :: forw: Version 9 of the kernel is newer than the master kernel. >>

The previous remote kernel is still activated as before.

What's going on? I am perplexed.

Maven – Versions according to third parties

I have a question about the version when I depend on a third party project (TP from now on) for the version. Our current process is to release a new version every time TP creates a version with security fixes. The problem arose when they launched a version with new functionality that we want to use in one of the projects, but we do not want to migrate the other projects to the new version.

Script

Current structure of the project

Third party project (version 5.5)
My base project (version 1.2 (inherits v5.x))
My project 1
My project 2
My project 3 

New project structure

Third party project (version 5.6)
My base project (version 1.3 (inherits v5.x))
My project 1
My project 3
Third party project (version 6.0)
My base project (version ?? (inherit v6.x))
My project 2 

Key points

  • They are Maven projects and are inherited from the main project pom.xml
  • I can not use the import scope because both projects (TP and Base projects) modify the life cycle of the application.
  • To move from TP version 5.6 to 6.0, an expensive migration process is necessary.
  • Both new versions (5.6 and 6.0) have security corrections, so it is advisable to update all the projects.
  • Version 6.0 has new features that we need in My Project 2
  • TP could launch version 7.0 and it would have 3 active versions of My base.

Question

I would like to receive some advice on how to version My Base Project to keep more than one version active at the same time.

How did Microsoft develop the DOS and previous versions of Windows?

This question came up while I was exploring several retroactive projects in which people write software for old computer systems for fun: how did Microsoft really develop DOS and Windows? The period of time I'm thinking about is in the mid-late 80's.

I guess the whole development was based on IBM PC systems and that most DOS should have been written together so that they need at least one text editor of some type, MASM and then the batch compilation process. Maybe there was a DOS port of vi or some other commercial source code editor of the time?

Assuming that Windows 95 was designed on Windows 3.1 workstations in an earlier version of Visual C ++, how was Windows 3.1 written? The same process as with DOS? Did not they need another graphic environment to "boot" theirs?

They have tried to find a book on the history of Microsoft, but they seem to be very much focused on the founders and not on the technology.

Versions of Android – My 6edge is 32 gb. I have used approximately 13 gb, but in the storage option it shows that 31 gb is used … where is my memory rest? Please clear

Some of your previous responses have not been well received and you are in danger of being blocked.

Please pay close attention to the following guide:

  • Please make sure answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid

  • Ask for help, clarifications or respond to other answers.
  • Make statements based on opinion; Support them with references or personal experience.

For more information, see our tips on how to write excellent answers.

Subsequent processing: How to generate the preview in batches for several versions of filters / layers applied to the same image in Photoshop?

Recently I am experimenting a lot with postproduction, to look for a new style. I find it very tedious to see several combinations of adjustment layers (also with several opacities), blending modes, LUT, etc.

I even prepared a special .psd file with a large number of layers that I simply activated and deactivated, but I still find it ineffective.

I would like to be able to generate in batches a complete series of the same image with different effects, in the different degrees applied. I have not found anything suitable for this, only options & batch & # 39; but for different image files. Have I overlooked something or is the only way to record a loooong action, which will apply various settings and save the images during the process?
I thought it would be a natural option to generate previews of the image with different LUTs, for example, but I have not found anything …

How to resolve conflict of PHP versions? [on hold]

I can not install the compositor for magento 2, my php version conflict,

PHP Conflict Error

What versions of PHP are similar to 7.0.27? [on hold]

What versions and subversions of PHP are similar in
In functions or syntax to 7.0.27. I want to know what other version has minimal differences with respect to version 7.0.27.

seo – Can alternative language versions rely on Canonicals to satisfy the requirement to return to the original page?

Let's say I have 4 URLs.

URL 1) www.example.com/en/main-content
URL 2) www.example.com/en/similar-to-main-content

URL 3) www.example.com/fr/main-content
URL 4) www.example.com/fr/similar-to-main-content

The second URL in the list has a canonical tag to the first URL in the list, and the fourth URL in the list has a canonical tag to the third URL in the list.

In terms of languages, URL & # 39; s 3 Y one they are alternative versions to each other, and they are also 4 Y two.

Google requires that each alternate The version has a two-way label, one on each page pointing to the other. It's URL two allowed to point your alternate tag to the URL 3, as URL 3 Anyway, it has a canonical code to URL. 4, or must point to the URL 4?

serious games – Migration of previous versions of Unity to new

I am a student of computer science near to obtain my degree. I need to complete a project, so one came up and I would like to know your opinion because I do not know anything about Unity. Therefore, there is a game that a teacher developed, it is a static one (so there are no 3D graphics) with static backgrounds and actually shows dialog boxes and needs the user to choose one of the four available options. And this is happening throughout the game. It is supposed to be a serious game with the aim of improving your decision-making skills. So you are the CEO of a company for a week and since you get up until you sleep at night, you make decisions about different CEO matters.

What I have to do is take this game (which was created in the Unity 2015 version) and migrate it as in the Unity 2018 version because my teacher told me that for some reason the game is not compatible with version 2018. I will have about 2- 3 months to do it. Therefore, I would like opinions on whether it will be (probably) an easy or difficult task. Because I think it's going to be easy and I just want to graduate and continue with my life …