Nginx multiple routes with proxy step and proxy redirection

So I am trying to proxy a subdomain to a subdirectory in my root domain. I need to redirect multiple routes to make it work properly. But I would like to make it shorter and possible, perhaps more efficient and easier to maintain?

location /blog {
    proxy_set_header Host forum.ultraluz.com.br;
    proxy_pass https://forum.ultraluz.com.br/;
    proxy_redirect https://forum.ultraluz.com.br/ http://test.ultraluz.com.br/blog;
    proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
}

   location /stylesheets {
    proxy_set_header Host forum.ultraluz.com.br;
    proxy_pass https://forum.ultraluz.com.br/stylesheets;
    proxy_redirect https://forum.ultraluz.com.br/ http://test.ultraluz.com.br/blog;
    proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
}

The above are two examples of my current configuration that work. But this one … why?

 location ~ (blog|stylesheets|assets|svg-sprite|404-body|message-bus|latest.json|javascripts|logs|u) {
    proxy_set_header Host forum.ultraluz.com.br;
    proxy_pass https://forum.ultraluz.com.br/$1$is_args$args;
    proxy_redirect https://forum.ultraluz.com.br/$1$is_args$args http://test.ultraluz.com.br/$1$is_args$args;
    proxy_http_version 1.1;
    proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade;
    proxy_set_header Connection 'upgrade';
    proxy_set_header Host $host;
    proxy_cache_bypass $http_upgrade;
}

The root subdomain should live in /blog and all asset routes that should be searched correctly from the subdomain and served with the URLs of my root domain

Using the summary step at the end of the wizard user interface?

I am designing a wizard to add events to a calendar. The last step
The wizard is the summary of the user's choices.

Is it mandatory to use it or can I skip it?

P.S. Number of steps with summary: 4.

Does the SFML function do all the work with the configuration of the time step?

Usually, I set the time step something like this:

timestep=1.0f/60.0f;
if(time>=timestep)
{
update;
time-=timestep;
}

But SFML has the following function: window.setFramerateLimit (). Does it do the same as described above?

usability: how to support a "Save draft" in a wizard approach when the user takes a long time to complete a step?

I have a simple user workflow, in which the User has to complete the process sequentially. But step 2 may take a day or more to complete.

In the current UI, if the user decides to complete the process later, they can click on "save" to skip the process and will go to the summary page. The user can save the entire process as a draft. When the user returns to edit, there will be no assistant approach. You can modify each step by individually selecting the steps of the summary process.

enter the description of the image here

Is the approach intuitive? Is there an alternative pattern to manage saving draft in an assistant approach?

I did not meet the requirements of paragraph V4.2 (a) (c) (e) Appendix V, what does it really mean? And what is the next step to reapply

I was denied a tourist visa because it did not meet the requirements of paragraph V4.2 (a) (c) (e) Appendix V, what does it really mean? And what is the next step to reapply?What is the next step for the next application to be approved?

Pygame: what is the other step to create a 2D side scrolling platform game?

Thank you for contributing a response to Game Development Stack Exchange!

  • Please make sure answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid

  • Ask for help, clarifications or respond to other answers.
  • Make statements based on opinion; Support them with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. Reference MathJax.

For more information, see our tips on how to write excellent answers.

I will write 100 articles of 500 words each step unique and unique copy for $ 10

I will write 100 articles of 500 words every step copyscape and unique

I will deliver First class Applicable content in a blog, article or any other website content. As a fluent and experienced English writer, I guarantee you 100% original work (i.e. Without plagiarism)
If you are only starting In the lucrative blogging business, then I am your "friend." The same goes for established blog owners interested in maintaining or improving your presence and credentials online.

Wondering what I am offering?

  1. Ghost writing– I work in the shadows so you look good.
  2. FREE plagiarism content.
  3. First level use of instruments in English
  4. Timely delivery
  5. Best of all …Exemplary customer service and communication. In addition, you (customer) are always right.

For any complement or special request, do not hesitate to contact me and we can formulate a reasonable agreement.
Let me take advantage of my skills and knowledge (accumulated for more than 10 years) to your advantage.

I hope to get the best out of you.

. (tagsToTranslate) writing (t) article (t) seo (t) content

How to add texts to the payment step Onepage payment page

What file should I edit to add text under all payment methods? (I would like to add some return / refund policy).

URL is

https://www.mywebsite.com/checkout/#payment

enter the description of the image here

dnd 5e – Is my Homebrew Reactive Step spell balanced?

I have prepared a spell at home that is effectively a combination of to protect (in terms of time) and foggy step (in terms of its effect) that I have called reactive step. It is intended for sorcerers, sorcerers and magicians.

I have reasoned that it is a second level spell, like foggy step, but I wonder if I am missing something about how it could be used that makes a second level spell space too cheap, or if it is so niche that it is actually too expensive. I think it's probably good or too cheap for a reason I haven't thought about, so I wanted some comments on whether its use justifies its spell level.

Reactive step

Second Level Spell

Audition time: 1 reaction, what do you take when you are hit by a melee attack
Distance: Me
Components: V, S
Duration: Instant

When you are hit by a melee attack, you can teleport up to 30 feet into an unoccupied space that you can see, turning the triggering attack of a blow into a fault.

I originally played with the idea of ​​only teleporting after receiving the damage of the triggering attack, but then I decided that it would be less attractive, so I changed it to avoid the damage of the original attack (turning the blow into a failure). I include this because some might think that would do They have been balanced as I originally planned, but not in their current form, so the answers may choose to include that detail.

I have also restricted it to melee attacks, since I believe that teleporting in response to ranged attacks is perhaps too powerful for what I intended this spell to be (mainly to take out the soft spellcasters from melee), otherwise, it would make the hedge shot an almost perfect strategy (running out of full coverage in his turn to make a ranged attack, teleport to full coverage in the enemy's turn after they try to hit him with a ranged attack, rinse and repeat).

So, in its current form (restricted to melee attacks, it turns the trigger attack into a failure), is this spell balanced, specifically with respect to the level of the spell?

The Azure LogicApp Stored Procedure step cannot see the Azure managed instance when configuring the connection

My requirement is to read a set of rows returned by a stored procedure that is in the Azure managed instance through an Azure Logic App step. In the logical application I am using step & # 39; SQL stored procedure (V2 ) & # 39 ;. When I refer to the managed instance, the connector cannot resolve (see) the instance and I cannot connect.