published adventures – What is this Call of Cthulhu scenario set in England or Scotland, where a a dilettante asks the characters to look for his missing daughter?

Around a month ago, I’ve read somewhere about a scenario, which right now I can’t seem to find.

All I remember, that it’s setting was either in England or in Scotland, and it has two key antagonists. If I am not mistaken, the hook is that a dilettante asks us to investigate his missing daughter, but that’s not 100% info, maybe I am mixing things up already in my head. The other things I know about it are:

that at the beginning of the scenario, one of the antagonists I think is starting to turn into a were-jaguar and kills a prostitute in the town, and at the end of the scenario if the players don’t succeed the whole town is devoured by something.

I would be really grateful if anyone could point me to the name or the book of this scenario:]

published adventures – Looking for a specific Call of Cthulhu scenario

Around a month ago, I’ve read somewhere about a scenario, which right now I can’t seem to find.

All I remember, that it’s setting was either in England or in Scotland, and it has two key antagonists. If I am not mistaken, the hook is that a dilettante asks us to investigate his missing daughter, but that’s not 100% info, maybe I am mixing things up already in my head. The other things I know about it are:

that at the beginning of the scenario, one of the antagonists I think is starting to turn into a were-jaguar and kills a prostitute in the town, and at the end of the scenario if the players don’t succeed the whole town is devoured by something.

I would be really grateful if anyone could point me to the name or the book of this scenario:]

Real Estate Scenario Editor

Hello everyone,

I am looking to edit my real estate photos, can anyone tell which app or Photoshop should i use to organize my empty houses and make them into an amazing busy scene?

I really appreciate your help,

Thank you

Can a use case scenario be generic?

No one knows exactly what generic means to whoever made the generic use case request. The best step is to go back to them and ask for examples, then try to derive the theme that runs through those examples (if any).

Trying to answer more philosophically, I suppose that a use case can be generic when it describes interactions that are valid, but in reality they do not differentiate the product from any other. Register, reset your password, click links – these are not strictly universal, but are so common and similarly implemented that they can be called generic.

Is a tree or autocomplete a better user experience for the following scenario?

I am creating a web app (web app only, no mobile functionality) and I am wondering if I should use a tree selection (where the user breaks down the hierarchical categories until he finds his selection) or an autocomplete (where the desired result is written to and it is filtered based on what has been written and then you can select the result. More specifically Angular Material are the versions of each one you would use. The links for the description and functionality of each one are below

Tree

https://material.angular.io/components/tree/overview#nested-tree

https://stackblitz.com/angular/eaalmyagbxpn?file=src%2Fapp%2Ftree-nested-overview-example.ts

Autocomplete

https://material.angular.io/components/autocomplete/overview#adding-a-custom-filter

https://stackblitz.com/angular/yoqybbxoegl?file=src%2Fapp%2Fautocomplete-filter-example.ts

The details of this widget are as follows:

The user can only choose 1 option.

Each individual user will create these options for their own account. Therefore, the selectable options that User 1 sees will be completely different from what User 2 can see, since each user will create them specifically for their own needs.

I'm sure the number of options each user creates for himself will be no less than 5 and no more than 50 the vast majority of the time (there will be no restrictions in any way, but it would be weird for someone to go over or over below these numbers).

They will probably use this feature 5 to 25 times a day.

Please let me know what everyone thinks. Would a tree selection be a better UX experience or would auto-complete be better?

Traveling to other EU countries for work when my work permit visa is in process in Sweden in the current scenario

I have applied for a work permit visa in Sweden. I finished my master in Sweden. My employer is registered in Sweden. For the work requirement I need to travel to Germany, but my current visa has expired and the work permit visa is in process. Can i travel now

postgresql: designing a multi-tenant database for a scenario with multiple types of users

I am developing a SaaS application to recruit that has multiple types of users like Client, Recruiter, Panellist Y Owner etc. There is also a possibility that user types may increase.

the Owner have a Organization And this is what my tenant will be. Here I am considering the organization of each owner as a tenant. I am using Django to develop this application and I will use the schema function provided in PostgreSQL, therefore there will be a scheme for each tenant

What I plan to do is that there will be a User table to be kept in the public scheme and stores generic user information such as name, surname, email, password, etc. User The table will be used to log in to the site. And there will be additional tables for each of the respective user types, each with its own unique set of columns. These additional tables will be specific to the tenant / organization.

Now once the user logs in to the site, they can change to their desired tenant / organization something similar to how workspaces work in Slack. Within the tenant / organization, the user can assume the role of the user types mentioned above that were assigned by the Owner to the user Then the user can be a Recruiter in a tenant and he can also be a Panellist in another tenant

There will be a UserOrganization junction table that will track the fact that a User can belong to multiple Organization.

Here is an outline diagram of what I am thinking:

Outline diagram

NOTE: I didn't make the schema connection for the tables in the second tenant because it was starting to get complicated, but I assume they are present there.

My questions are:

c # – Design decision for cloning scenario

As part of my app, I keep a cache which is structured like below,

class Container
{

       List ExecEnvList;
       List ToBeProcessedControlModList;
       // Other Properties goes here
       // Other properties can be either simple type or List of other objects etc..,
     .....
}

class ExecEnv
{
       ObservableCollection ExistingContModList;
       ObservableCollection NewContModList;

       // Other Properties goes here
       // Other properties can be either simple type or List of other objects etc.., 

}

class ContMod
{ 
      // Lot of properties, It will be either simple type, list or dictionary

}

The cache is the container dictionary,

       Dictionary  IDToContainerList;

NewContModList is initially empty inside Container. Business logic will process each Container and distribute ToBeProcessedControlModList to all ExecEnvtoes. I don't want to update this cached NewContModList. This NewContModList must be updated to ExecEnv whenever the client requests it.

So I keep one more map, which has ID ExectionEnv as key and list of ID newControlMod as value

    Dictionary> ExecEnvIDToNewContModList; 

The customer request for the data in the following method,

     GetNewAssignments(int ContainerId, ref List processedList)
     {

           // Check the avaialability of Cotnaier in dictionary here;
           if(IDToContainerList.ContainsKey(ContainerId))
           {

                Container cont = IDToContainerList(ContainerId);

                // Get ExecEnv List copy from the requested Container and update new List

                processedList = cont.ExecEnvList.Clone();   // Assume clone extension method is implemented for List

                // Logic to Update NewContMod List here
           }                     

     }

     The above code updates NewContMod in my cache as well. I don't want this behavior.

I wanted the NewContMod list to be updated only in the reference argument of the processed list.

Thus the Clone method was implemented in ExecEnv as shown below,

    public object Clone()
    {
        var obj = (ExecEnv) this.MemberwiseClone();

        obj.ExistingContModList = new ObservableCollection(ExistingContModList.Select(x => (ControlMod)x.Clone()).ToList());
        obj.NewContModList = new ObservableCollection(NewContModList.Select(x => (ControlMod)x.Clone()).ToList());


        return obj;
    }

After doing this I achieved what I want. NewContModList is updated only in the ref argument of processList. NewContModList is not updated in the original cache.

I come from C ++ background, I understand that all C # objects are of reference type, so we need cloning method to get clone copy. So in the above approach, I need to clone other objects from the list like above.

So I need expert help to understand is there any better design approach to handle this above scenario?

people – what's the difference between Scenario and User Journey?

Creating a user journey places a strong emphasis on people and also combines the creation of scenarios and user flows. However, unlike user flows, hierarchies, or functional specifications (which explain the interaction between a user and the logic and processes of a system), user journeys explore "patterns, processes, and routes" mental and lived of a user and translate them to websites. experiences.

(…)

Think of user needs and associated content in some form of time-based progression. You need a beginning, middle, and end. Everything is quite logical; the trick is simply to play roles. Put yourself in the mindset of your user and imagine how the states of need change as you go through the general process.

In other words, a scenario can be considered a unique situation and a journey can be a collection of scenarios that together form a narrative that defines the total user experience of using your site.

Why is AG distributed over normal AG preferred for the failover scenario of the cross data center?

I have two WSFC nodes and I am currently working on a DR solution with an availability group. I already read the Microsoft document on distributed AG. So, my question is what are the benefits of using distributed AG compared to normal AG? Can we simply extend WSFC through the data center and make this happen with normal AG?