Rush Limbaugh: Trump "can fire any ambassador he wants. It's not a plot, it's not a crime, it's not a flawless crime." True or false?

True.

Ambassador Yovanovitch says that President Trump is unnaturally reducing his career.

The previous government changed all the ambassadors to install those who sympathized with the new government since day 1. So he got a better deal from Trump than he could reasonably expect.

If she hadn't run through Ukraine speaking ill of the new president and allowed Ukrainian whistleblowers to travel to the United States to explain American corruption in Ukraine, she could still have a job now.

dnd 5e – Can a magician use his family member's senses to expand his "can you see" area?

Yes, you can teleport somewhere that your family members see whenever you are currently Looking through his eyes.

From the Find Family spell:

… as an action, you can see through the eyes of your relative … (PHB 240)

If you have taken the action of seeing through your family member's eyes, and so Launch Misty Step, so yes, you can teleport to a place your family member can see, provided That is not more than 30 & # 39; from your current location.

magento 1.9: how to fix it "Can not send the headers, the headers have already been sent

a: 5: {i: 0; s: 119: "Headings can not be sent, headings have already been sent in /home/stepup441/public_html/app/code/core/Mage/Core/functions.php, line 60"; i: 1; s: 1029: "# 0 /home/stepup441/public_html/lib/Zend/Controller/Response/Abstract.php(115): Zend_Controller_Response_Abstract-> canSendHeaders (true)

``````# 1 /home/stepup441/public_html/app/code/core/Mage/Core/Model/App.php(1265): Zend_Controller_Response_Abstract-> setHeader (& # 39; Content-Type & # 39 ;, & # 39; text / html; char ... & # 39;)
# 2 /home/stepup441/public_html/app/code/core/Mage/Core/Controller/Varien/Front.php(80): Mage_Core_Model_App-> getResponse ()
# 3 /home/stepup441/public_html/app/code/core/Mage/Core/Controller/Varien/Router/Standard.php(202): Mage_Core_Controller_Varien_Front-> getResponse ()
# 4 /home/stepup441/public_html/app/code/core/Mage/Core/Controller/Varien/Front.php(172): Mage_Core_Controller_Varien_Router_Standard-> match (Object (Mage_Core_Controller_Request_Request_Http.png))
# 5 /home/stepup441/public_html/app/code/core/Mage/Core/Model/App.php(365): Mage_Core_Controller_Varien_Front-> dispatch ()
# 6 /home/stepup441/public_html/app/Mage.php(683): ​​Mage_Core_Model_App-> run (Array)
# 7 /home/stepup441/public_html/index.php(83): Mage :: run (& # 39; & # 39 ;, & # 39; store & # 39;)
# 8 {main} "; s: 3:" url "; s: 10:" / index.php "; s: 11:" script_name "; s: 10:" / index.php "; s: 4:" skin "; s: 7:" default ";}
``````

lo.logic – What it means "can almost be shown in \$ PA \$" means in relation to Theorem 2 of Timothy Chow's expository article, "The consistency of arithmetic"

In his expository article, "The Consistency of Arithmetic," Professor Chow has the following theorems:

Theorem 1. yes $$a_1$$, $$a_2$$, $$a_3$$, … is a sequence of ordinals and $$a_i$$ $$ge$$ $$a_j$$ when $$i$$ $$lt$$ $$j$$, then the sequence stabilizes; that is, there is $$i_0$$ $$ge$$ 1 such that $$a_i$$ = $$a_0$$ for all $$i$$ $$ge$$ $$i_0$$.

Theorem 2. yes $$M$$ It is a Turing machine that given. $$i$$ as input, it outputs an ordinal $$M (i)$$Y $$M (i)$$ $$ge$$ $$M (i + 1)$$, then the sequence stabilizes.

Note that Theorem 2 "is a weak corollary of Theorem 1." Additional note on what Prof. Chow writes $$PA$$ and its relation to Theorem 1 as found in its answer to IamMeeoh's question about mathematical overflow, "Understanding the accounting ordinals up to $$epsilon_0$$ (56062)

It seems to me that after understanding this test [of Theorem 1–my comment]The hard part of wrapping my head is how it can be true that $$PA$$ make do not prove that there is no infinite descending sequence. My current intuition is that $$PA$$ as strangely weak, because he can not even formalize a test as simple as this one.

With respect to Theorem 2, write (on page 22 of his expository article):

… In fact, Theorem 2 can almost be proven in $$PA$$.[Keepinmindthatonthelegofpage7onthepageyouwritethat[Notethatinfootnote7onpg26hewritesthat[Tengaencuentaqueenlanotaapiedepágina7enlapág26escribeque[Notethatinfootnote7onpg26hewritesthat$$PRA$$ + Theorem 2 implies that $$PA$$ It's consistent – my comment.]

How does Professor Chow justify this? Consider the following, again form pg. 26 of his expository article:

First, we can formulate a theorem – call it $$1 ^ {& # 39; theorem$$– it is an intermediate force between Theorem 1 and Theorem 2, which restricts Theorem 1 to weakly diminishing ordinal sequences that can be defined by a first-order formula $$phi$$. To prove this version of the theorem, suppose we have a formula $$phi$$ which defines a sequence of ordinals that weakly diminishes and states that everyone has at least one height $$H$$ [seethedefinitionoftheheightoftheteacherChowandhissystemofkeymarksbelow[seeProfChow'sdefinitionofheightandhissystemofordinalnotationsbelow[vealadefinicióndealturadelprofesorChowysusistemadenotacionesordinalesacontinuación[seeProfChow’sdefinitionofheightandhissystemofordinalnotationsbelow$$epsilon_0$$ on pg.25 – my comment]. So we can imitate the proof of Theorem 1 to build a $$PA$$ proof of theorem $$1 ^ {& # 39;}$$ for $$phi$$. The only downside is that we need, as building blocks, P$$A$$ proof of theorem $$1 ^ {& # 39;}$$ for smaller formulas that $$H$$– but we can assume by induction that they are available. Keep in mind that this is an inductive procedure for construction $$PA$$ Tests of individual instances of the theorem. $$1 ^ {& # 39;}$$ and can not be converted to $$PA$$ proof of theorem $$1 ^ {& # 39;}$$ itself; however, it illustrates that each instance of Theorem $$1 ^ {& # 39;}$$ It can be proved without assuming the existence of infinite sets.

Interesting so far … but there are questions (for example, the question I asked in the title is still not answered by Professor Chow's quote cited above). Why? Well, according to Professor Chow, Theorem 1 "presupposes the concept of an arbitrary infinite set and, therefore, is not finite." From the theorem $$1 ^ {& # 39;}$$ is "intermediate in force between Theorem 1 and Theorem 2, the order of" force "in this case refers to (for example) Theorem 1 is" ​​more infinite "than the theorem $$1 ^ {& # 39;}$$ (because "each instance of the theorem $$1 ^ {& # 39;}$$ it can be proved without assuming the existence of infinite sets "), and the theorem $$1 ^ {& # 39;}$$ it's more infinite & # 39; that Theorem 2 (but that's exactly the question I asked in the title, since "Theorem 2 can almost be shown in $$PA$$"must, in a certain sense, be & # 39; infinite & # 39 ;, that is, your proof must" assume the existence of infinite sets ", but how? … also, given the" list "notation of" ordinals " "from Professor Chow below $$epsilon_0$$"How can you extend that to include $$epsilon_0$$ as a "special type of finite list of finite lists of finite lists of … finite lists" [this from his answer to IamMeeoh’s mathoverflow question–my comment])?

Finally, it may seem to the reader of this question to read the article by Maria Hameen-Antila, ordinal nominalistas, recursion in the superior types and finitismo. Symbolic logic bulletin, 25 (1): 101-124 (2019) because it provides the historical context in which to understand Prof. Chow's expository article, his notation list system (which would be an example of a nominal noun representation of transfinite ordinals) and its theorems 1, $$1 ^ {& # 39;}$$and 2 (and a possible financial interpretation of Theorems 1, $$1 ^ {& # 39;}$$, and 2).

Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Food and drink: What is the meaning of "Can I have a slice?" In New York?

I spent yesterday with some friends in Manhattan. We were in a common food area of ​​a mall and had just started eating pizza when a couple of college-aged boys stopped by our table and one of them said, "Can I have a slice?"

My friend replied: "Sure, if you pay for it" and then the guy said, "Oh, you're not from around here" and then he and his friend quickly left.

My friends and I wonder if he really wanted a slice of pizza or if he was asking for something else. We are all from the Midwest, so forgive us if we are not in touch with the modern sayings / jargon of the East Coast.

Windows Server 2016: ASP.NET CORE 2.0 web application in IIS showing sqlite error 14 "Can not open database file"

So I had a problem when I tried to host a web application. Everything works fine in Visual Studio and when I use IIS Express for debugging, but when I publish it and upload it to my server to host it, this error (title) appears. Of course, I'm using sqlite3 as the database, the file is located outside the project and the data source path is correct. I tried to publish it when the file is inside the project (inside wwwroot, with the data source only /dbname.db) and outside, but in both cases error 14 of sqlite appears.

Keep in mind that the solution to this problem could be as simple as adjusting some permissions if we say that this is the cause of the problem, since I still do not have much experience in the use of IIS.

Scan more than 150 pages using the scanning functionality of Google Drive. It took me a while. After that, when I was trying to save the generated PDF, I received a notification saying "you can not schedule the file to load". When I press it, it opens Google Drive but does nothing else or gives any information about the PDF file. Did I just lose more than an hour of page scanning? Can I recover at least the images I took with the Google Drive application?

ray network – SendPayment lnd "can not find a route to the destination"

I received an error "can not find a route to the destination" when I called SendPayment to an invoice, created in starblocks.acinq.co, from my local private LND node in mac (docker).

It seems that getinfo and getnetworkinfo are not a problem. Am I missing something? (for example, open a port or connect a channel) How can I debug it?

• my local private LND node
``````# lncli --macaroonpath = / home / bitcoin / .lnd_1 / chain / bitcoin / testnet / admin.macaroon --rpcserver = localhost: 10010 --lnddir = / home / bitcoin / .lnd_1 getinfo
{
"version": "0.6.1-beta commit = v0.6.1-beta-21-g863bf2f91b245afd58c8edc078a171a55e48f931",
"identity_pubkey": "02a5d8c2fa771570cefd4ab00be298daffca4d64c77cfc8a0d411a6c1b638cc092",
"alias": "02a5d8c2fa771570cefd",
"num_pending_channels": 0,
"num_active_channels": 0,
"num_inactive_channels": 0,
"num_peers": 3,
"block_height": 1517489,
"block_hash": "00000000000000723b9b81a3d7433385eec9e03fe1ecff2a3ea850171f70f639",
"synced_to_chain": true,
"testnet": true,
"chains": [
{
"chain": "bitcoin",
"network": "testnet"
}
],
"uris": null
}

# lncli --macaroonpath = / home / bitcoin / .lnd_1 / chain / bitcoin / testnet / admin.macaroon --rpcserver = localhost: 10010 --lnddir = / home / bitcoin / .lnd_1 getnetworkinfo
{
"graph_diameter": 0,
"avg_out_degree": 6.239715591670899,
"max_out_degree": 775,
"num_nodes": 1969,
"num_channels": 6143,
"total_network_capacity": "48768373513",
"avg_channel_size": 7938852.924141299,
"min_channel_size": "4000",
"max_channel_size": "16777216",
"median_channel_size_sat": "5000000"
}
``````
• invoice created in starblocks.acinq.co

https://starblocks.acinq.co/order/75c4e1cceefa2b59c49890f1e5466680

email – Docker: ssmtp in the php container says "Can not open the mail: 25"

Can not open the mail: 25

The configuration of /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf

``````root = postmaster

mailhub = mail.domain.com

hostname = 6836e93c ...
FromLineOverride = YES
``````

I tried to change the mailhub to the default email, but I had no luck.

I was thinking about writing 50 ports in the EXPOSE section in the docker file. But it does not help. Does anyone have any idea how to fix it?

Windows 10 – SCCM, Dell Optiplex 7060 "Can not download PXE variable file Output code = 14"

Ok, then I am trying to start PXE this machine through IPv4, UEFI mode, safe boot enabled. I receive the following messages: