MySQL – Can we use the same temporary table name in different stored procedures?

In our database, we generate statistics by periodically calling a large number of stored procedures in the event.

Taking into account that there are two SP

auto_update_daily_users
auto_update_daily_orders

Is there a conflict when using the same temporary table name? temp1) in both stored procedures?

I checked the Questions and Answers in SO, they say that the scope of the temporary table is the current session. I think it means when we connect the db server with the clients.

But in my case, all the sps run on the server side. So, could someone explain this?
Thank you.

SQL Server: calls to mysterious procedures without parameters, but without generated exceptions

I've been tracking a handful of stored procedures with EventClass RPC: Completed that are called intermittently from .Net SqlClient Data Provider without the required parameters, just "exec SprocName". If I manually call them as they appear in the TextData of the trace, they generate an exception, but no exceptions are generated in the original trace. The Error column for these calls "without parameters" shows "1 – Error", but I do not understand how the call does not generate an exception. At first, I suspected that it was a technical problem with the profiler, that "1 – Error" caused the parameters to be truncated from TextData, but I see the same results in an extended event session. Has anyone seen anything like this in their profile tracings or event sessions? It is almost certain that the application makes these calls as part of an extreme case error, but why is the SQL server not an exception?

Triggers and procedures.

Based on the following tables, answer the following questions:

enter the description of the image here

Machine Learning: How to concatenate two different word embedding procedures?

I am currently working with NLP and my pipeline extracts inlays in a way. My hypothesis is that if we add a second addition to our system, the accuracy and precision of the engine will improve the performance of the current system. So, what is the correct way to concatenate two different word embedding outputs?

Stored Procedures Correction Tests – Software Engineering Stack Exchange

Suppose you have 2 stored procedures, say a GetProducts and a GetProductDetails.
Now, GetProducts returns a list of products with a property that is "calculated" based on an additional calculation (the last time it was purchased, the number of resellers, etc.).

How can I be sure of the accuracy of the data returned?

Should I call GetProducts, then, for each product, call GetProductDetails and finally verify the correctness of each result?
Or do I have to call GetProductDetails only for a random product (s)?

procedures: double citizenship with the US UU and Australia, but with only a US passport. UU

Probably not. As Australian citizens, their children are not eligible to receive ETA, and they will not be allowed to travel on the plane without one. If you arrive at the border with Australia, there may be some problems while things are resolved, and more problems if you leave the country without an Australian passport (although you can request one while you are in the country to avoid this).

Having said that, some people have reported that they request ETA as Americans and that (incorrectly) they have been granted one anyway, so their mileage may vary.

sql server – Performance problem of stored procedures 1.5 million records in the temporary table

I have a scenario in which I am executing the next query within a stored procedure as part of a SQL agent job and it takes me hours to complete the execution. Can anyone suggest a better approach to rewriting this query? The # property table has 1.5 million records.

        WHILE (@last_update> 0)
START
Insert in # property
SELECT DIFFERENT
a.ParentNumber,
b.Number of child
DE # property a,
# property b
WHERE a.ChildNumber = b.ParentNumber
AND IT DOES NOT EXIST (SELECT 1
DE # property c
WHERE c.ParentNumber = a.ParentNumber
And c.ChildNumber = b.ChildNumber)
SET @last_update = @@ ROWCOUNT

FINISH

postgresql: return of multiple result sets of server-side procedures in Postgres 11

This blog post from a Postgres consulting firm mentions that the new server-side procedures support in Postgres 11 could return multiple sets of results.

➥ Did this feature appear in the Postgres 11 version?

If so, can you explain how it works briefly? Show some code example?

SQL server: nested stored procedures and capture blocks: problem ERROR_PROCEDURE ()

I have noticed something strange, and I hope that someone in the community has an answer for me. I have noticed that when a stored procedure is nested It seems that all the blocks before the last catch block have a strange error with the function ERROR_PROCEDURE () where it returns the name of the previous block procedure. NOTE: This only happens when RAISERROR is used. When using THROW, the last procedure in the chain is always reported.

Since that was probably confusing, here is an example.

CONFIGURE NOCOUNT IN

IF OBJECT_ID (N & # 39; tempdb .. # spCatchTest1 & # 39;) DOES NOT BEGIN NULL
FALL PROCEDURE # spCatchTest1
FINISH
TO GO

CREATE PROCEDURE # spCatchTest1
AS
START
Start
EXEC # spCatchTest2
Final test
Start to capture
PRINT & # 39; CATCH EXPECTED = # spCatchTest1; CURRENT = & # 39; + ERROR_PROCEDURE ()
DECLARE @Err NVARCHAR (4000) = ERROR_MESSAGE ()
RAISERROR (@Err, 16, 10);
--;THROW
Final capture;
FINISH
TO GO

IF OBJECT_ID (N & # 39; tempdb .. # spCatchTest2 & # 39;) DOES NOT BEGIN NULL
DROP PROCEDURE # spCatchTest2
FINISH
TO GO

CREATE PROCEDURE # spCatchTest2
AS
START
Start
EXEC # spCatchTest3
Final test
Start to capture
PRINT & # 39; CATCH EXPECTED = # spCatchTest2; CURRENT = & # 39; + ERROR_PROCEDURE ()
DECLARE @Err NVARCHAR (4000) = ERROR_MESSAGE ()
RAISERROR (@Err, 16, 10);
--;THROW
Final capture;
FINISH
TO GO

IF OBJECT_ID (N & # 39; tempdb .. # spCatchTest3 & # 39;) DOES NOT BEGIN NULL
DROP PROCEDURE # spCatchTest3
FINISH
TO GO

CREATE PROCEDURE # spCatchTest3
AS
START
Start
EXEC # spCatchTest4
Final test
Start to capture
PRINT & # 39; CATCH EXPECTED = # spCatchTest3; CURRENT = & # 39; + ERROR_PROCEDURE ()
DECLARE @Err NVARCHAR (4000) = ERROR_MESSAGE ()
RAISERROR (@Err, 16, 10);
--;THROW
Final capture;
FINISH
TO GO

IF OBJECT_ID (N & # 39; tempdb .. # spCatchTest4 & # 39;) DOES NOT BEGIN NULL
DROP PROCEDURE # spCatchTest4
FINISH
TO GO

CREATE PROCEDURE # spCatchTest4
AS
START
Start
SELECT 1/0
Final test
Start to capture
PRINT & # 39; CATCH EXPECTED = # spCatchTest4; CURRENT = & # 39; + ERROR_PROCEDURE ()
DECLARE @Err NVARCHAR (4000) = ERROR_MESSAGE ()
RAISERROR (@Err, 16, 10);
--;THROW
Final capture;
FINISH
TO GO

EXEC # spCatchTest1 

This will result in:

EXPECTED CATCH = # spCatchTest4; CURRENT = # spCatchTest4
EXPECTED CATCH = # spCatchTest3; CURRENT = # spCatchTest4
EXPECTED CATCH = # spCatchTest2; CURRENT = # spCatchTest3
EXPECTED CATCH = # spCatchTest1; CURRENT = # spCatchTest2
Msg 50000, Level 16, State 10, Procedure # spCatchTest1, Line 11 [Batch Start Line 81]
An error of division by zero occurred.

As you can see in the second line, the upper level capture incorrectly reported the name of the procedure. This looks like only affects the processes that occur in the chain after the error.

Has anyone else noticed this? Besides, it's a mistake, right? Is there a way to get the correct name of the procedure when it is nested?

Programming procedures: How do I repeat the number of times a nested loop iterates?

I'm trying to write a nested loop to print the pairs from 00 to 55, with each digit running from 0 to 5.

In other words, I want the output to be shown as such: 00, 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 10, 11, …, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55.

I know I can do this using two variables, one representing the first digit and the other representing the second digit. I am also aware of how to create a for loop that prints, for example, digits 0-5 once, but how do I get it? Mathematics Repeat this process 5 times so that the exit pattern continues up to 55?