algorithms – MIT 6006 Quiz 2: The shortest path task

I’m looking for some clarifications on an algorithmic task I’ve been trying to solve. This task is a part of Quiz 2 from the MIT 6.006 course.

The main idea of creating k-copies of a graph G is clear. What I’m really confused with is the final graph G':

  • Can you explain how the graph G' will look like?
  • How will the G' graph guarantee that all of the places {v0, v1, v2, vi} had been visited once we reached the destination vertex t?

I’m sorry if the community to post this question is wrong. Any suggestions are highly appreciated.

Input:
enter image description here

Solution:
enter image description here

Can I use an API licensed under MIT in my project?

Hey I was making a project on Covid-19 and I needed an API for data.I found an API https://github.com/mathdroid/covid-19-api but this is licensed under MIT license on github. I am not sure if I can use it in my project and put it on my github profile.
Update: I am a beginner to development world so kindly think before giving down votes.

reverse engineering – mit Kat Williams, der berüchtigten Rock n Roll Braut mekleid.de

http://www.mekleid.de/g/9ce2-m1fzy-normale-taille-reissverschluss-a-linie-mini-brautjungfernkleid-mit-borduere.jpg

Rachel Simpson sagt: “Vintage-Mode feiert weiterhin ein Comeback und niemals mehr als auf dem Brautmarkt. Bei so vielen kreativen Talenten aus dem Herzen des Landes war es absolut sinnvoll, sie unter einem Dach zusammenzubringen, um die erste Vintage-Brautparade in den Midlands zu veranstalten. ” 

Clare Guest berichtet, dass” Bräute uns immer öfter fragen, wo Sie können sich Ideen für eine Hochzeit im Vintage-Stil einfallen lassen… “ 

Es ist eine ziemlich fabelhafte Linie, direkt darüber, oder?!

In der Highbury Hall kleider schwarz, einem beeindruckenden viktorianischen Haus, findet die zweitägige Veranstaltung statt, bei der die Gäste durch eine Explosion von Epochen schlendern können. Jeder Bereich ist einem Jahrzehnt des Stils gewidmet und voller Schätze und Must- hat für die vintage liebende zukünftige Braut. 

Und falls Sie das Detail im obigen Beitrag nicht bemerkt haben, lassen Sie mich Sie ein bisschen mehr für Sie in die Luft jagen … 

Ja, ich werde mit Kat Williams brautkleider Weiß, der berüchtigten Braut Rock n Roll, da sein – Bräute zu treffen und mit ihnen zu plaudern, um ihre Hochzeit zu planen und einen guten alten Kinnwedel mit Branchenkontakten zu haben. 

My application is using a mit licensed code as back-end, so where should i include the license?

The license is commented in PHP but is it fine that way or do i need to do something else too? As my back-end codes are not open sourced.

license: Animate.css that uses the MIT license is copyrighted or not

I want to use https://github.com/daneden/animate.css/blob/master/LICENSE but without violating copyright.

In case the license indicates that it is MIT, but it has the following extract in the license:

Conditions
 License and copyright notice

Now I have the following question, where do I put the warning? It may be inside the code in the excerpt used, should I tell you that I use the license or that I am using the author?

Do I need to put all this code at the beginning of the code?

The MIT License (MIT)

Copyright (c) 2019 Daniel Eden

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
SOFTWARE.

Why don't I see anyone doing it, but if so, which one would be right? What part should I put and where?
I hope, I'm a beginner and I don't want to violate copyright.

github – MIT license on

/ *!
=================================================== =======
* ArchitectUI HTML Theme Dashboard – v1.0.0
=================================================== =======
* Product page: https://dashboardpack.com
* Copyright 2019 DashboardPack (https://dashboardpack.com)
* Licensed under MIT (https://github.com/DashboardPack/architectui-html-theme-free/blob/master/LICENSE)
=================================================== =======
* The above copyright notice and this permission notice will be included in all copies or substantial parts of the Software.
** /

I want to delete some line like this

/ *!
=================================================== =======
* Copyright 2019 DashboardPack
* Licensed under MIT (https://github.com/DashboardPack/architectui-html-theme-free/blob/master/LICENSE)
=================================================== =======
** /

can i do or this is legal

Why is the MIT read amplitude search algorithm so complicated?

I saw a video for BFS from MIT and the algorithm presented by the professor was really complicated compared to what occurred to me. My solution seems to work well and walk through the vertices in the correct order. Am I missing something?

public static void BFS(GraphNode currentNode, GraphNode searchedNode) {
    if (currentNode.index == searchedNode.index) {
        System.out.println("Found!");
        return;
    }

    if (visited(currentNode.index)) {
        return;
    }

    visited(currentNode.index) = true;

    for (GraphNode child : currentNode.children) {
        if (!visited(child.index)) {
            nodeQueue.add(child);
        }
    }

    if (!nodeQueue.isEmpty()) {
        BFS(nodeQueue.poll(), searchedNode);
    }
}

One drawback is that it continues to run after finding a node, but that could be easily solved by cleaning the queue when the element is found.

mit license – How to correctly accredit the authors of a library with MIT license in this case?

I am using a modified MIT license code directly in my project and I am worried about how to attribute it correctly.

The code in question has no license text in each file, only a LICENSE file at the top level. I have included the contents of that file in my own license file. In this file I also have the licenses for other libraries that I use, but these are not modified and live in separate directories in the project, which makes the origin clear.

I am concerned that this does not make clear what is the origin of a particular code in my project. I'm curious to know if this is really a problem and if it is, how could I handle it better?

Thank you

Can I use Bootstrap templates with MIT license in my SAAS product? [closed]

We are developing a SAAS product. Can we use Bootstrap templates with MIT license as an interface in our SAAS product?

Licensing: What happens when an MIT licensed project uses Apache 2.0 controllers to connect to GPLv3 databases?

I am working on a SaaS medical research startup project with an MIT license. The goal is for the source to be open (because customers can help improve it and find errors), and end users who want to pay to use it can go to the site and start. If someone wanted to fork it or borrow the code for another SaaS, I really don't care.

However, I want to use Neo4j for the Cypher query language, because I think it's pretty good. We enter the Neo4j startup program, but it lasts 1 year without any clarity about what happens at the end of that year, and Neo4j business licenses are incredibly expensive, like tens of thousands of dollars per server. There is a community edition licensed under GPLv3, and I was going to run it on AWS.

Now for my problem. If my source code is in GitHub with MIT license, and I put "docker run neo4j" in the development code (to make a local database to test it) … that counts as "GPLv3 software distribution" and forces me to GPL license my project with MIT license? The software I write uses MIT / Apache 2.0 stuff and I want to keep it that way because it allows companies to use my stuff without licensing issues. Also, things on github are not for sale, but the site hosted is what I would sell.

What happens when an MIT licensed project uses Apache 2.0 controllers to connect to GPLv3 databases? Does "Docker run" count as distribution?

(Yes, I know, "just use Postgres")

Thanks in advance for any advice or clarification, and yes, I know you are not a lawyer.