co.combinatorics – Powerful existence theorems with mild conditions: more recent examples

I would like to write an article about powerful existence theorems that assert, under mild and simple conditions, that a minimum regular pattern always exists. By mild conditions I mean short, easy, broad conditions. By simple conditions I mean not requiring advanced mathematical education. The conditions and the statement should be accessible to undergraduate mathematics/science students.

I am interested mostly in low-dimensional examples which allow an easy graphical representation.

I have some obvious examples in mind (given below), but they are rather classical results that were established between 1900 and 1950, roughly speaking.
I would be interested to see examples that are more recent.

Classical examples I have in mind

(1) Lemma of Sperner and Brouwer Fixed Point Theorem (for $n=2$)

(2) Lemma of Tucker and Borsuk-Ulam Theorem (for $n=2$)

(3) Ramsey’s Theorem (for the simplest case of 6 edges)

(4) Wagner’s Theorem about Planar Graphs

I would be grateful if you could point me to more recent examples.

The medical statistics are clear: of all the cases * KNOWN * COVID, 3.4% have died. What about such mild cases that carriers don't know they have it?

What is the point of finding a cure?

Another Chinese man or woman will simply ruin the world again, but perhaps in a different way, and if it is not a Chinese man or woman, then it could be another race.

Have you heard of the Zika virus?

"The Zika virus was first discovered in 1947 and is named after the Zika forest in Uganda. In 1952, the first human cases of Zika were detected and since then, outbreaks of Zika have been reported in tropical Africa, Southeast Asia and the islands of the Pacific. "

We also have the coronavirus.

There are also more viruses.

"Virus 219

There are 219 species of viruses that are known to infect humans. The first of these discovered was the yellow fever virus in 1901, and there are still three to four new species each year. "

Visit: https: // …

algebraic geometry ag. – Suitability of reductive group actions in mild varieties

Suppose that $ G $ it is a reductive algebraic group that acts on a mild variety $ X $, and that the action has finite stabilizers. When is the action of $ G $ in $ X $ appropriate? What is an example where the action is not adequate?

I am aware of a similar statement that is Proposition 0.8 in the Mumford GIT, which says that the action is appropriate if the geometric quotient $ phi: X a X / G $ exists and $ phi $ It is similar I would like to know in what situations one can assume that the action is adequate without this assumption.

related varieties – Tangent package for a mild algebraic variety

I was discussing with a friend how to define the tangent package for a mild variety, since this is very natural in the multiple environment and we could not find references discussing in detail.

For example, yes $ X subset mathbb {A} ^ n $ it is a related algebraic variety we can define the tangent package $ TX subset mathbb {A} ^ {2n} $where first $ n $ coordinates respect for the equations to $ X $ and the other the equations for tangent spaces: $ sum_ {i = 1} ^ n { frac { partial f} { partial x_i}} (x) y_i = 0 $. This implies that $ TX $ It is an algebraic variety, but my problem is: is this a vector pack? The problem is that I don't see how it will be locally trivial. Zariski's open sets are very large and will impose a lot of rigidity; Nor is there an implicit function theorem, so we can get trivializations to $ TX $ as in the complex analytical point of view.

If this is locally trivial, how can it be shown? Otherwise, can you easily find an example?

at.algebraic topology – Are all varieties in $ mathbb R ^ n $ homeomorphic to a mild variety?

My question is whether all the multiples that can be embedded in $ mathbb R ^ n $ Are they homeomorphic to a mild variety?

I know that each smooth manifold can be triangulated, which I think is the result of Whitehead and I believe that each manifold in $ mathbb R ^ n $ It can be triangulated, so this gives credibility, I think. (If the multiple of dimension 4 E8 can be embedded in $ mathbb R ^ n $ So we have a counterexample but I'm not sure if it can be. All the collectors of dimension up to 3 can be triangulated).

I appreciate if this is a basic question, but it doesn't seem to be explicitly explained anywhere. Most textbooks define a variety and then a mild variety, but do not say in which cases these concepts can be equivalent.

The most powerful country in the world 2018 …?

This is a discussion about The most powerful country in the world 2018 …? within Discussion of members forums, part of the Community Center category; Hello friends,

Please tell me, what is the most powerful country in the world 2018 …? …