Is it possible to show ads legally without the consent of EU users?

The EU cookie law, I believe, requires the consent of the EU user to place cookies. The ads I know on the website use cookies.

Is it possible to show ads legally on the website without the consent of EU users?

Dungeons and dragons: why did D&D Paladins originally have the requirement to be legally good?

Short answer: originally they didn't have to be legal Good

The original Paladin published in Greyhawk was aligned as Legal. Full stop
(This is very less frame challenge).

The alignment matrix in Men and magic (TSR, 1974, Gygax Arneson, p. 9) showed three:
Legal, neutral, chaotic. That's.
The two-axis system was first shown in a Strategic Review article (SR # 6, February 1976) and then in the "Basic D&D" of Holmes before AD&D took to the streets but after the publication of the Original Paladin

Greyhawk (TSR, 1974, Gygax / Kuntz, p. 8) says this about Paladins:

Charisma scores of 17 or more by fighters indicate the possibility
of the paladin state IF THEY ARE LEGAL since the beginning of the game by
that character If such fighters choose they can become
paladins always doing legal actions, for any chaotic act will be
immediately revoke the state of paladin, and it can never be
recovered The paladin has a series of very powerful aids in his
continuous search for good: it can be "imposed on your hands" to heal wounds
or diseases in others (two damage points for each level that the
Paladin has reached, a disease for every five levels, whether function
executable but one per day). Paladins are not subject to
disease. They have 10% more salvation against all forms of
attack (excluding melee). Level 8 and above paladins dispel evil
(spells, undead, evil enchanted monsters and the like) simply by
ordering it like this, and they detect everything wrong in a 6 "range. Paladins
with any form of "Sacred Sword" they are virtually immune to all magic (see

In bold the "legal actions" and "any chaotic act", but the rest is the original emphasis of the author.

At stake: we were a typical adventure party in a large group in the late 1970s, and we had a paladin that was legal, and that at stake was practically an example of the legal good that you would see in the requirements of AD&D 1e for its account. Choice to play the knight with shining armor. We met paladin NPCs led by a legal cleric (but in our eyes, not particularly pleasant and sure that it is not good from our point of view) who came to our city and imposed the law, the adventurers. My particular druid was cited as undesirable, since he was a cleric of heretical neutral nature. Our Paladin was criticized for associating with us. (We have some thieves and some X-thiff multiclass characters).

Legal it was the primary consideration: that alignment restriction (which was moved to the Legal Good later) was a cost for class benefits. Not only could you choose to be a Paladin: you had to qualify for it and you had restrictions (also mentioned in Greyhawk) (1) in treasure and (2) the number of followers you could attract and, of course (3) you cannot change the alignment.

The legal good originally happened in Advanced Dungeons and dragons, 1e

Note that it says, in the original version of the class, that the paladin "is looking for good." That germ of an idea that Lawful and Good would marry came true in the AD&D 1e PHB. The statistical requirements also increased: Force 12, Wisdom 13, Constitution 9, Intelligence 9: these were minimal along with a Charism 17 (rolled up) or you could not qualify for this subclass of Fighter / Fighter of the good legal paladin.

While the appointment of Three hearts and three lions of the accepted answer shows some valid sources (without real disagreement) there were additional inspirations that can be seen in the entries selected for the AD&D 1e Gods, Demigods and Heroes section covering Arthurian Legends. Galahad and Lancelot feature prominently. If you look at the original Greyhawk Paladin: the imposition of the Paladin's hands can be traced in mythology and literature to be a reflection of Mallory's history. Morte d & # 39; Artur scene where Lancelot revives a gentleman who has killed. This leaves a vivid impression on Queen Geneva.

Another literary inspiration for him knights with shining armor The trope can be found in OD&D and AD&D 1e inspiring reading lists offered by the author. There is a good summary here in an interview with Mike Mearls where he discusses the roots of D&D in terms of short stories, novels, Moorcock's Law vs. Chaos conception and more. One of the most interesting things that one extracts from the interview with Dave Arneson is that his favorite class to play, in terms of challenge, was the Paladin, but the amount of contributions he had in that class, and his final form, can be lost in the ages

Can companies legally store their government-issued card?

I recently sent my personal information (address, government issued card, blah blah) to a company (trusted)
I'd like to know if it's stored in your database or if it was deleted after verification and it's gone forever.

Lollipop 5.1: how to legally kill an Android phone? (With root or not)

I recently bought the LG G4 Dual phone, but I really hate it because I can't flash later versions of Android because BL is locked and impossible to unlock. Later I had Sony M4 Aqua and I killed him somehow under a 1.5-year (2-year) warranty, so I got M5 because if I had wanted to have M4, I would have waited a long time for repair. However, I can root this phone. Is it possible to kill him in some way?

Legal – What can and cannot be done legally with editorial photos?

Legal issues vary by region and Internet tips may be worth what you pay.
This is not advice, just the general rule I use.

When it comes to "editorial" use, the medium is irrelevant; context is king.

The purpose of a launch is to provide permission to others to be assigned views / opinions on derivative works. Releases may be necessary for all kinds of things (not just people) and their use, need and enforceability vary by jurisdiction.

Editorial images are usually the result of situations where a release cannot be obtained or where the creators have authorized them specifically for that purpose. For example, many large companies make a subset of their own image libraries available to the press, usually after a verification process to ensure they are legitimate.

The images provided for editorial use are just that, they are intended for illustrative use as part of a larger work in which the image is not the main / unique focus (along with a written article) or contains the elements of the story directly in situations like news reports and photo essays

Take a picture of someone eating cakes in a competition held in a public place. A photographer covered the event and provided them in editorial form.

You have an article that discusses why you like the cake more … it's fine, since the context is clear that the subject definitely also likes the cake. Even as a cake shop owner, it would be clear if the content & # 39; editorial & # 39; It was clearly separated from any promotional / advertising content.

However, an article that discusses eating disorders that implies that the subject has such a disorder would not be right. That could be the only competition to eat cakes in which they have participated and, in fact, otherwise eat healthy, if the subject discovers the content that a libel lawyer will probably take to the cleaners.

Even editorial use does not avoid other legal obstacles (for example, copyright and privacy rights that have stronger protection in some regions than in others).

Can a spider legally possess a weapon?

No. A spider is not recognized as a & # 39; person & # 39; legal.

Right now, work is being done to try to get chimpanzees to be recognized as legal persons with all the rights that humans enjoy, but it will be a long time before that happens, and the rights of spiders will be A LOT behind.

Why can't people understand that Trump was legally allowed to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden because Biden committed an international crime?

What crime did Biden commit?

What Biden did was to anger an Ukrainian prosecutor who was not doing his damn job, and was not doing his job not only in the eyes of Biden and the US. UU. He is not doing his job in the eyes of the European Union representing 28 countries and he was not doing his job in the eyes of the IMF!

The prosecutor even withdrew his claims long before Trump made his call to the president of Ukraine leaning on him to dig up the land of the Bidens for his own political benefit!

You're making yourself look like a real fucking jacka $$ asking this fucking idiot question! This is in the bag, silly idiot, Trump is as corrupt as he always has been, the honor of the office of the President of the United States made no difference in his character, did not suddenly change overnight when he made the oath of office, he is still the liar and scammer puppet that was self-service that was when he failed to fulfill several loans, when he had to declare multiple bankruptcy, when he hardened and scammed thousands of Americans from his earned money with so much effort in so many his silly scams!

And the sooner you cross it in your thick and silly skull, the better!

Legal – Can I legally post my own photos of commercial products on my website and social networks?

I am not a lawyer and any advice or opinion I give is mine. You must not act or refrain from acting on any information provided by me or others.

Indian law is largely based on British law and they are quite similar in this area, as I understand it.

The application of Copyright It depends on your work. If what you have done adds an obvious creative element to that image through layout, composition, lighting, etc., then you are safe from them. If what you have done is essentially make a photographic copy of your brand, then it is definitely not right. It is also worth noting that the product you choose can be very iconic and you should be careful not to reproduce images made by other photographers because that can open it up to cases of copyright infringement by THEY.

You have to consider your brand. Will your work be used in a way that you can interpret as your support or the services you offer? They are fiercely protective of their brand and should consider this as a very likely situation, in which they are likely to get into trouble.

Above the two you should consider, even if you are right, if you can afford to defend yourself in a civil case. Its potential adversary is a multi-billion dollar global brand with deep pockets and a team of expert lawyers on call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Is it something you can afford to defend yourself even if you are correct? Even if you can, do you need stress in your life?

Since what you want to do is stand out, you should consider doing (or having a local artist do for you) some of your "own brand" products. In the case of cans, you can wrap them in vinyl or repaint them easily and the results may appear very well (with practice), car modification sites could give you a good start. The bottles are a bit more complicated and for that you would opt for the classic ones, or for a standard bottle, so you can print your own brand labels at a low price. Look online at various forums for people who make movie and theater accessories, there are usually practical guides and examples of various materials in use.

legal – How does Airbnb continue to operate legally?

I have never been an Airbnb host, so I will not know the agreements that Airbnb has with the hosts, but I have stayed in many Airbnbs and have observed the following phenomena. Many times, my hosts tell me to remain informal (as if I were a regular visitor) when entering the apartment or condominium complex and, if asked, should answer that I stay with my friend (my host).
It seems that they do not have the legal right to sublet the property and, therefore, taking money to let them stay with them is illegal. How does this legitimately continue under Airbnb?
This is definitely affecting the local hotel industry.

Although I suppose that my hosts on those occasions did a grim job without Airbnb's warning, that logically does not allow Airbnb to wash its hands by saying that "it is the fault of the host and we are not legally obligated to take action."
If something really happens with the guests, then Airbnb & # 39; should & # 39; Be partially responsible too.
Any website of this type must have a verification mechanism (which denotes trust in the host).

My question is if there is none of that on Airbnb, how is it still legitimate?

Can Paypal legally freeze my money?

Can Paypal freeze the funds for longer than they declared? My girlfriend sent me over $ 200 and I froze the funds – hahaha.
It has been said that for 3 weeks they had to verify my documents, definitely everything is good for me. The support does not respond, and a month has passed. So can I demand something from them with judgment? I read the comments of Paypal and several problems with the freezing of funds, but I did not find an answer anywhere. I will be grateful for your help