Show that there is no computability reduction HP \$ le \$ \$ Sigma \$ *

Let's try more: yes $$L$$ it is a language and $$L not in mathsf {R}$$, so $$L not le_ mathrm {T} L & # 39;$$ For any $$L & # 39; in mathsf {R}$$. (Here, $$le_ mathrm {T}$$ indicates a reduction of Turing; this is synonymous with his notion of a reduction of "computability". In other words, $$mathsf {R}$$ It is closed under the Turing reductions.

Suppose, in the face of a contradiction, that such a reduction exists and is calculated by a Turing machine. $$M$$. Also, let's go $$M & # 39;$$ be a decision maker for $$L & # 39;$$. Then there is a Turing machine that solves $$L$$, that is, simulating directly $$M$$, answering all your oracle queries by simulating $$M & # 39;$$ about them, and, in the end, responding to what $$M$$ make. This contradicts $$L not in textsf {R}$$.

The case of the problem of detention is deduced from not being in $$mathsf {R}$$ (since he is not even in $$mathsf {RE}$$) and, of course, $$Sigma ^ ast in mathsf {R}$$.

A side note: if you find the idea of ​​closed classes interesting under the Turing reductions, I suggest you look for the theoretical notion of calculating the degree of Turing. $$mathsf {R}$$ it would be the "base case" (ie zero degree) in that context.

It is \$ k (| a_1 | + | a_2 | + … + | a_n |) le | b_1 | + | b_2 | + … + | b_n | + k | S | \$ Right?

Is inequality as true?

Leave $$k> 0, a_i> 0$$ for $$1 le i le n$$ and let $$S: = a_1 + a_2 + …. + a_n$$ Suppose that $$b_i: = S-ka_i text {for} 1 le i le n.$$
So

$$k (| a_1 | + | a_2 | + … + | a_n |) le | b_1 | + | b_2 | + … + | b_n | + k | S |$$

Equality if only if $$S = 0$$

probability: why is the event \$ {X_ {(j)} le x_i } \$ equivalent to the event \$ {Y_i ge j } \$?

From the statistical inference of Casella and Berger:

Leave $$X_1, points X_n$$ Be a random sample of a discrete distribution.
with $$f_X (x_i) = p_i$$, where $$x_1 lt x_2 lt dots$$ they are possible
values ​​of $$X$$ in ascending order. Leave $$X _ {(1)}, dots, X _ {(n)}$$
denotes the order statistics of the sample. Define $$Y_i$$ as the number of $$X_j$$ that are less than or equal to
$$x_i$$. Leave $$P_0 = 0, P_1 = p_1, dots, P_i = p_1 + p_2 + dots + p_i$$.

Yes $${X_j le x_i }$$ it's a "success" and $${X_j gt x_i }$$ it is a "failure", then $$Y_i$$ it is binomial with parameters $$(n, P_i)$$.

Then the event $${X _ {(j)} le x_i }$$ is equivalent to the event $${Y_i ge j }$$

Can anyone explain why these two are equivalent?

$${X_ {(j)} le x_i } = {s in text {sun} (X _ {(j)}): X _ {(j)} (s) le x_i }$$

$${Y_i ge j } = {s & # 39; in text {sun} (Y_i): Y_i (s & # 39;) ge j }$$

I have trouble understanding how these functions of random variables show this equivalence.

The whole process will only take a few minutes.

– Title: or laila teri le legi hd video song
– Status file: clean (as of the last analysis)
– File size: undefined
– Price: free
– Special requirements: do not

if the page has a free search, but the other does not … good video good … demo code or even … after downloading h … potential song cnet … le … hd. .. teri. .. laila … legi …

raw.githubusercontent.com/ManiacDC/Typin…t 333333 weighted by frequency (Norvig) .txt
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/M…rdlist 333333 weighted frequency (Norvig) .txt

The whole process will only take a few minutes.

– Title: dj virtual le 7
– Status file: clean (as of the last analysis)
– Qualification:
– Last update: 26.05.2019 21:04:29
– File size: undefined
– Price: free
– Special requirements: do not

VirtualDJ provides an instantaneous combination of BPM rhythms, synchronized sampler, scratch, automatic … Download VirtualDJ Download …, Virtual Vinyl … is free for … DJ controllers that are still on the market today come with the old "VirtualDJ 7 LE …

Version types like LE, Home, Broadcaster, Pro … 7 are even more advanced than most. Download virtual dj mixer – Virtual DJ Free …

Virtual DJ Download, Virtual DJ 7.4.1 en VirtualDJ is the best software for mixing AUDIO and VIDEO with the BeatLock engine. Virtual DJ questions and answers card in virtual dj In Virtual DJ · Be the first to answer How to download Virtual DJ for free? In Virtual DJ …

VirtualDJ provides an instant combination of BPM rhythms, synchronized sampler, scratch, automatic … Virtual DJ LE. Suitable for both the DJ Bedroom … RX2 has a large 7-inch touch screen with QWERTY … to control VirtualDJ. Free download in the "…

Free virtual keyboard, free download. Free Virtual Keyboard 4.1: The virtual virtual application that must be taken into account. Vista Free Virtual Keyboard and compatibility with: Windows 7 Windows 8 Windows XP Windows 2000 Windows 2003 Download 43K Download totali …

DJ ProDecks, download free. DJ ProDecks 2: Consolle gives DJ per mixare music. 7 DJ … SoundCloud Altri Altri Le leggi che regolano … download? Get FREE Alternatives to DJ ProDecks Virtual DJ Diventa a vero deejay Serato DJ …

A quick and easy way to download free software for Windows PC. The latest versions of the hand-selected programs are classified into categories. Way to download free software … April 20 19 – Le VPN 1.1.10 April 20 … Pro VPN 4.6.151 7. Skype 8.43.0.56 8. VLC … 24.85 Virtual DJ Virtual DJ …

DJ Music Mixer, download free. DJ Music Mixer 8.1: DJ Music Mixer. by DJ by mixare and riprodurre brani with due deck Versione di prova 7 MixPad Free Music Mixer Multimedia by Windows Gratis 7 Download by …

DJ Software – VirtualDJ – Productos Antiguos
Download Virtual Dj 7 Pro Serial – Fast Mirrors – FnNQYHrWOI –
DJ Software – VirtualDJ – Hardware
http://www.virtualdj.com/products/legacy.html/
https://virtual-dj-turntable.it.softonic.com/android
https://bitbucket.org/snippets/princehinson1966f4/xKnyoM/
https://bitbucket.org/snippets/bernarddutcher1979m2/6rAE6z/
http://www.virtualdj.com/products/hardware.html
https://free-virtual-keyboard.it.softonic.com/
https://dj-prodecks.it.softonic.com/
https://www.filehorse.com/
https://dj-music-mixer.it.softonic.com/
şebnem tovuzlu unut beni mp3 indir

integration – Proof that \$ int_ { pi / 6} ^ { pi / 2} frac {x} { sin {x}} le frac { pi ^ 2} {6} \$

Proof that $$int _ { pi / 6} ^ { pi / 2} frac {x} { sin {x}} le frac { pi ^ 2} {6}$$

After some calculations I get it if I take $$frac {3} {2} x$$ then after the integral I get $$frac {3} {4} x ^ 2 + C$$ Y
$$int _ { pi / 6} ^ { pi / 2} frac {3} {4} x ^ 2 + C = pi ^ 2/6$$ so I should show that
$$frac {x} { sin {x}} le frac {3x} {2}$$

But the last inequality is not true …

real analysis – For \$ g (x) = int_0 ^ infty frac {1} {x + y} f (y) , dy \$, Show \$ m {x in (0, infty): g (x)> lambda } le 1 / lambda cdot lVert f rVert_ {L ^ 1} \$

Q: for $$x in (0, infty)$$ leave:
begin {align *} g (x) & = int_0 ^ infty frac {1} {x + y} f (y) , dy \ end {align *}
Show that to $$f in L ^ 1 (0, infty)$$:
begin {align *} m {x in (0, infty): g (x)> lambda } & le frac { lVert f rVert_ {L ^ 1}} { lambda} \ end {align *}

My job:

begin {align *} E_ lambda & = {x in (0, infty): g (x)> lambda } \ end {align *}

By tchebychev

begin {align *} m (E_ lambda) & le frac {1} { lambda} int_0 ^ infty g (x) , dx \ & = frac {1} { lambda} int_0 ^ infty int_0 ^ infty frac {1} {x + y} f (y) , dy , dx \ end {align *}

I'm a little stuck here. Is there any integration technique to solve or simplify this integral?

nt.number theory – About the determinants \$ det left[(ipm j)left(frac{ipm j}pright)right]_ {1 le i, j le (p-1) / 2} \$

Leave $$p$$ be an odd cousin and define
$$D_p ^ +: = det left[(i+j)left(frac{i+j}pright)right]_ {1 le, j le (p-1) / 2}$$
Y $$D_p ^ {-}: = det left[(i-j)left(frac{i-j}pright)right]_ {1 le i, j le (p-1) / 2},$$
where $$( frac { cdot} p)$$ It is the symbol of Legendre.

QUESTION. Is my next conjecture true (formulated in 2013)? How to solve it?

Guess. For any cousin $$p> 5$$ with $$p equiv1 pmod4$$, we have
$$left ( frac {D_p ^ +} p right) = 1 = left ( frac {D_p ^ -} p right).$$

Observation. (i) I have verified the conjecture of all the cousins $$5 with $$p equiv1 pmod4$$.

(ii) For any prime $$p equiv1 pmod4$$, clearly $$D_p ^ –$$ it is a determinant of symmetry of bias and, therefore, it is a whole square by a Cayley result. But I can not show that $$p nmid D_p ^ –$$ for all the cousins $$p> 5$$ with $$p equiv 1 pmod4$$.

In my opinion, the conjecture does not seem so difficult. Your comments towards your solution are welcome!

Show that \$ Lambda (t) le- frac C2 Lambda & # 39; (t) \$ if and only if \$ e ^ {2t / C} Lambda (t) \$ does not increase

Leave $$Lambda in C ^ 1 ([0infty))[0infty))[0infty))[0infty))$$ Y $$C> 0$$. Why $$Lambda (t) le- frac C2 Lambda & # 39; (t) ; ; ; text {for all} t> 0$$ keep if and only if $$e ^ {2t / C} Lambda (t)$$ is not increasing in $$t$$?

Is this just an application of Grönwall's inequality?

Actual analysis: is there \$ alpha> 0, beta in (0,1) \$ such that \$ dfrac { sum_ {k = 1} ^ n a_k} {n} le alpha (a_1 cdots) a_n) ^ {1 / n} + beta max_i (a_i) \$ has?

Leave $$a_1 ge a_2 ge cdots ge a_n ge 0$$ You will be given non-negative numbers. My question is this:

There are some $$beta in (0,1), alpha> 0$$, such that $$dfrac {a_1 + cdots + a_n} {n} le alpha (a_1 cdots a_n) ^ {1 / n} + beta a_1?$$

This article derives the inequalities from above, with $$alpha = 1$$ Y $$beta = 1 / n$$, but with $$sum_ {1 le i instead of $$a_1$$, multiplied with $$beta$$. Also, your method does not seem applicable to address my question. Is there any known result about this or is it an open question? Any ideas regarding how to proceed? Thanks in advance.