[ Politics ] Open-ended question: Presidential advisers *, Fox News, say they ignore orders to stay home and return to normal life. Are the winners going to do it?

Please go ahead. Do you think education is expensive? Try ignorance. Carlson and other Fox News experts ignore the widespread consensus among infectious disease and public health experts that the only way to slow the spread of the virus and prevent thousands, if not millions, of deaths is to keep people in their homes until the model shows that it is safe to reopen businesses, schools and public places.

Pruning doesn't ignore the top-level directory of what I specified

When i do this

mkdir -p a/b/c
mkdir -p a/d/e
find ./a -path ./a/d -prune -o -type d

I understand this:

./a
./a/d
./a/b
./a/b/c

I must be misusing the plum flag. How do I ignore the directory? ./a/d as well as the output of my find?

When will search engines ignore the rules in my robots.txt to NOT crawl my website and files?

I'm working with a marketer who wants to set up a website with a text field for people to type in their URL from another secret but publicly accessible website. Let's say the public but secret access website is located at https://you-are-the-winner-of-this-amazing-scavenger-hunt-and-now-you-will-get-a-free-trip-to-mars-with-space-x-accompanied-by-elon-musk.com.

The seller is concerned that someone may discover this super secret url by searching for it through search engines or other popular online search tools.

I imagine if I configure https://you-are-the-winner-of-this-amazing-scavenger-hunt-and-now-you-will-get-a-free-trip-to-mars-with-space-x-accompanied-by-elon-musk.comI just have to make sure that robots.txt it has the appropriate rules to disable.

But my question is under what conditions will search engines ignore my disablement rules? Is there any other way for people to discover the URL? https://you-are-the-winner-of-this-amazing-scavenger-hunt-and-now-you-will-get-a-free-trip-to-mars-with-space-x-accompanied-by-elon-musk.com through internet searches?

debian – logcheck ignore one of my ignore patterns

I have been using logcheck for over a decade and never had a problem. Now some messages are ignored and I can't understand why.

Me ignore.d.server/_self contains:

^w{3} ( :0-9){11} (._(:alnum:)-)+ sudo((0-9)+): pam_unix(sudo:session): session (opened|closed) for user root( by (uid=0))?$

Running sudo -u logcheck logcheck -o -t:

# sudo -u logcheck logcheck -o -t
This email is sent by logcheck. If you wish to no-longer receive it,
you can either deinstall the logcheck package or modify its
configuration file (/etc/logcheck/logcheck.conf).

Security Events for sudo
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Apr  2 19:25:40 logger sudo(5726): pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user logcheck by (uid=0)
Apr  2 19:25:42 logger sudo(5726): pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user logcheck
Apr  2 19:25:49 logger sudo(6847): pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user logcheck by (uid=0)
Apr  2 19:25:50 logger sudo(6847): pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user logcheck
Apr  2 19:27:31 logger sudo(7988): pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user logcheck by (uid=0)
Apr  2 19:27:33 logger sudo(7988): pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user logcheck
Apr  2 19:27:41 logger sudo(9107): pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user logcheck by (uid=0)
Apr  2 19:27:43 logger sudo(9107): pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user logcheck
Apr  2 19:33:03 logger sudo(10884): pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user logcheck by (uid=0)

System Events
=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Apr  2 19:25:40 logger sudo(5726):     root : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/etc/logcheck ; USER=logcheck ; COMMAND=/usr/sbin/logcheck -o -t

The main messages should not appear. I am sure my regular expression is fine:

# echo 'Apr  2 19:25:40 logger sudo(5726): pam_unix(sudo:session): session opened for user logcheck by (uid=0)' | egrep '^w{3} ( :0-9){11} (._(:alnum:)-)+ sudo((0-9)+): pam_unix(sudo:session): session (opened|closed) for user root( by (uid=0))?$'
#
# echo 'Apr  2 19:25:42 logger sudo(5726): pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user logcheck' | egrep '^w{3} ( :0-9){11} (._(:alnum:)-)+ sudo((0-9)+): pam_unix(sudo:session): session (opened|closed) for user root( by (uid=0))?$'
#

Why are these messages not filtered?

How can I get a string containing an exclamation to be printed as text and ignore the! as a command?

I am trying to write a script to connect characters in a form. Text does not print as written. If I put the rope! Quien eres! 4 prints hoareyou. Drop the character after!

^ j ::
Send, Whoareyou! 4
Return

Example: oli

Azure sql data warehouse: how to ignore columns in parquet / polybase import?

I am using polybase to import a parquet file.

Over time, we can probably add or remove named columns in the file.

When I add an additional column the following error appears:

Access to external file failed due to internal error: & # 39; test.parquet file: HdfsBridge :: CreateRecordReader – An unexpected error was encountered while creating the log reader: HadoopExecutionException: Column counts do not match. The source file has 16 columns, the external table definition has 15 columns & # 39 ;.

This is because I added an additional column that was not in the external table definition.

Since the parquet contains a file schema and the external table knows the name of each column, is there a way that it can be configured to ignore the extra unused column?

magento2: During data migration with the data migration tool, the following error is encountered as seen in the screenshot: Is it safe to ignore it?

Stack Exchange Network

The Stack Exchange network consists of 175 question and answer communities, including Stack Overflow, the largest and most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their insights, and develop their careers.

Visit Stack Exchange

plugins: override / ignore CSS from active theme so as not to interfere with my custom CSS

I'm writing a simple plugin that displays on pages / posts a custom styled form for input fields, checkboxes, buttons etc. through a short code. When the user writes the shortcode on the page it generates some CSS, some HTML and some JavaScript, but the result is not rendered as I want, I think, due to the CSS active theme.
In fact, if I wrote the same combination of CSS, HTML and JavaScript in a simple HTML file, the rendering is perfect and if, in WordPress, I change the theme, the rendering changes …

How can I prevent the active theme from interfering with my plugin by rendering the controls as if they were embedded in a simple HTML page?

sql server: ignore null values ​​in columns. swing and unfold

I have the following data format

enter the description of the image here

I am looking for the following data format

enter the description of the image here

I try all the options but I can't reach the result below.

Query :

    select value1 as (Observation1),ob2.value2 (Observation2)
from (dbo).(FS_Daily_HSE_SAPS_Audit)
unpivot
(
  value1
  for col1 in ((ACT/CONDITION-1)
      ,(OBSERVATION-DESCRIPTION-1)
      ,(POTENTIAL-HURT-1)
      ,(ROOT-CAUSE-1)
      ,(SAFETY-CATEGORY-1)
      ,(SAFETY-DEFICIENCY-1))
) ob1

unpivot
(
value2
  for col2 in ( (ACT/CONDITION-2)
      ,(OBSERVATION-DESCRIPTION-2)
      ,(POTENTIAL-HURT-2)
      ,(ROOT-CAUSE-2)
      ,(SAFETY-CATEGORY-2)
      ,(SAFETY-DEFICIENCY-2))
) ob2
WHERE RIGHT(col1, 1) = RIGHT(col2, 1)
order by (submittedFormId);

wp query – custom WordPress search form – ignore empty / default input fields when sending them?

I have a form that I have developed that creates a WP_Query to search through a custom type of publication in WordPress.

There are 4 fields: title, author, orderby (selectbox), order (selectbox)

Let's say the user writes "cats" in the title and press search, my URL will look like this:

?spot_title=cats&spot_author=&spot_orderby=date&spot_order=desc

I prefer the URL to be simply

?spot_title=cat

Since the rest are the "default" and / or blank values. I'm not connecting this to JavaScript anywhere, but is that my only solution? I feel that WordPress would have an auxiliary function for this somewhere.

The HTML for the form is simple: