dnd 5e – Is it redundant that a vampire’s Regeneration is stopped by damage from holy water, since holy water already does radiant damage to undead?

Seems to be.

So, the first thing that came to mind was: maybe the vampire stops being an Undead when it is in Bat form? But no, it doesn’t.

Its statistics, other than its size and speed, are unchanged.

Notably, “Type” is one of the monster statistics, so even in Bat form it remains an Undead.

Are there vampires that are not undead?

Again: not as far as I am aware. All vampires in Curse of Strahd are undead as far as I remember and I don’t know of any Vampire that is not undead in published adventures.

I also don’t know of any RAW way to change the damage type of Holy Water, unless by some DM fiat on the rules about Damage Improvisation.

I also don’t know of any way a Vampire could change its type while remaining a Vampire.

So, yes, within published material, it seems to be a redundant text. However, it may be applicable under some house-rules or under content published in the future.

It may be intentional – to make clear that Holy Water is really, really effective against Vampires – or it may be an oversight from the writers and editors. Either way, no harm done, I believe.


Super edge-case

As discussed in the comments, there is an edge case where this might (very weak might – it still is up to DM interpretation) show up. A Druid player character turned into a Vampire. From the Monster Manual:

The game statistics of a player character transformed into a vampire spawn and then a vampire don’t change, except that the character’s Strength, Dexterity, and Constitution scores become 18 if they aren’t higher. In addition, the character gains the vampire’s damage resistances, darkvision, traits, and actions.

So, a Druid turned into Vampire would still have Wild Shape, from my reading, and would have the Regeneration feature from the vampires.

Then, it could use Wild Shape, which changes the creature type, becoming a Beast (or something else like Elementals for Moon Circle). Wild Shape then states

You retain the benefit of any features from your class, race, or other source and can use them if the new form is physically capable of doing so.

So, now it is up to the DM: is the new form physically capable of the improved regeneration provided by the vampirism? If (big if) the DM accepts that it does, then you now got a Beast with Vampire’s Regeneration. Holy Water would not deal radiant damage, but would deal some damage (improvised damage), and would still stop the regeneration. Is this intended? I highly doubt.

dnd 5e – Is a vampire’s specific vulnerability to holy water redundant?

Seems to be.

So, the first thing that came to mind was: maybe the vampire stops being an Undead when it is in Bat form? But no, it doesn’t.

Its statistics, other than its size and speed, are unchanged.

Notably, “Type” is one of the monster statistics, so even in Bat form it remains an Undead.

Are there vampires that are not undead?

Again: not as far as I am aware. All vampires in Curse of Strahd are undead as far as I remember and I don’t know of any Vampire that is not undead in published adventures.

I also don’t know of any RAW way to change the damage type of Holy Water, unless by some DM fiat on the rules about Damage Improvisation.

I also don’t know of any way a Vampire could change its type while remaining a Vampire.

So, yes, within published material, it seems to be a redundant text. However, it may be applicable under some house-rules or under content published in the future.

It may be intentional – to make clear that Holy Water is really, really effective against Vampires – or it may be an oversight from the writers and editors. Either way, no harm done, I believe.


Super edge-case

As discussed in the comments, there is an edge case where this might (very weak might – it still is up to DM interpretation) show up. A Druid player character turned into a Vampire. From the Monster Manual:

The game statistics of a player character transformed into a vampire spawn and then a vampire don’t change, except that the character’s Strength, Dexterity, and Constitution scores become 18 if they aren’t higher. In addition, the character gains the vampire’s damage resistances, darkvision, traits, and actions.

So, a Druid turned into Vampire would still have Wild Shape, from my reading, and would have the Regeneration feature from the vampires.

Then, it could use Wild Shape, which changes the creature type, becoming a Beast (or something else like Elementals for Moon Circle). Wild Shape then states

You retain the benefit of any features from your class, race, or other source and can use them if the new form is physically capable of doing so.

So, now it is up to the DM: is the new form physically capable of the improved regeneration provided by the vampirism? If (big if) the DM accepts that it does, then you now got a Beast with Vampire’s Regeneration. Holy Water would not deal radiant damage, but would deal some damage (improvised damage), and would still stop the regeneration. Is this intended? I highly doubt.

Holy lord – x4b.net sucks :angry:


So, I’ve been a customer of x4b.net now for some days.

From the first look at them, they seem completely normal. Affordable pricing, cool DDoS protection services, etc.

Then when you order, the hell begins. First of all, they don’t even give me support and the tunnel is not even working.

When I try to open a ticket they usually close it or say like this:

Code:

If you can't set yourself up we can do it for you under management ($35/hour).

Do not use it. You will regret it.

dnd 5e – Is this homebrew Holy Archer class ready for playtest?

So, after lots of thought I decided to present my homebrew class for review. The background on why I made it is here, but, in short, one of my players wanted to play a paladin-like ranged class. By the time, I did not consider the War Cleric or the Celestial Warlock, which were very good options for it, and instead I homebrew this Holy Archer class. Even with the options presented, I do feel like there is a place for a ranged paladin class, with similar features (divine smite and auras, for example) but more fit for ranged combat. At the very least, I like the concept of this class and I would like to make it playable, and I hope this is enough of a reason to create it.

As I shared in the meta, I was concerned that a whole class review would be hard, so I will structure the question in the following way:

  • I will present the feature and explain why I think it fits well for that level (i.e., is balanced) and why it fits well for the concept.
  • By the end of the question, I will share the comparisons I have made against other classes, and why so far I think the class is fairly balanced.

The reasons I need help are:

  • Spellcasting classes are fairly harder to balance, IMO, since the utility of spells is not easy to quantify.
  • I might have missed some obvious broken iterations or (as per the previous bullet) overestimated the usefulness of spells.

No more delays, I present you the Holy Archer. If you prefer to read it in a nicely edited PDF, this is an external link to my OneDrive with it.

For the question, I will highlight features that I am more concerned about. I will super highlight what I feel really needs a second opinion. In particular, these are the features at 3rd, 6th, 9th and 10th level.

As a final comment, this class was initially considered for Curse of Strahd, which runs from 1st to 10th level. For that reason, I have put more thought and effort on the 1st to 10th levels, and these are the ones I would like a review on. Once these levels are playtested and fairly balanced, I will move on to the next tiers. The PDF has a sketch on the higher levels but please ignore it.

I used the Paladin as a base-line. You will notice many features are changes to Paladin features, and/or features I felt fit in the class concept (e.g. slightly modified Improved Crit from Champion or Guided Strike from War Cleric). The reason I have preferred to use modified (or even as is) features from other classes is that they have obviously been playtested already, and I felt they were fitting as they were.

The class gets d8 as their hit dice, which seems appropriate for a ranged class (same as the rogue, specifically). They have proficiency in Light and medium armor, in simple weapons and in martial ranged weapons. The saving throws are Dex and Cha, following the concept of “one good and one bad ST”, and they get 2 proficiencies, chosen from Acrobatics, Insight, Medicine, Persuasion, Religion, Stealth. So far, I think these are fair additions that need little explanation and hardly will make it imbalanced in any way.

They are half-casters (as Paladins), so they get their spellcasting at 2nd level and get up to 5th level spell slots. Their spellcasting ability is Charisma. The reason I chose Charisma over Wisdom is that I did not want to give them two “more useful” primary abilities. Allowing them to focus on Dex, Wisdom and Con would allow them to focus on the 3 major Saving Throws, and Wisdom is also useful for Perception. With Cha, the player has to choose between better saving throws and perception or better spellcasting, from my point of view.

As for equipment, they start with a Longbow or a Light Crossbow, a dagger, Leather or Hide armor and a Holy Symbol. Usually my campaigns don’t have a problem with gold, so starting with a longbow rather than a shortbow seemed fine. I usually allow rogues to start with light crossbow as well. And I do not keep track of ammo.

As per @Molot suggestion, this is a table of the features in the class up to 10th level, compared to Paladin’s features (both get the same spellcasting slots).

$$
begin{array}{cll}
textbf{Level} & textbf{Holy Archer} & textbf{Paladin} \ hline
1 & text{Divine Sense, Archery} & text{Divine Sense, Lay on Hands}\
2 & text{Spellcasting, Holy Arrow} & text{Spellcasting, Divine Smite, Fighting Style}\
3 & text{Sacred Oath} & text{Sacred Oath}\
4 & text{ASI} & text{ASI}\
5 & text{Extra Attack} & text{Extra Attack}\
6 & text{Modified Aura of Protection} & text{Aura of Protection}\
7 & text{Purifier of Evil (extra damage} & text{Oath Feature}\
8 & text{ASI} & text{ASI} \
9 & text{Retreat} & text{Nothing} \
10 & text{Aura of Encouragement} & text{Aura of Courage}
end{array}
$$

1st

At first level, I gave them Archery and Divine Sense. Since it is more of a damage-dealing class than a tank-utility (Paladin), I chose to take away Lay on Hands. With the Fighting Style at 2nd level, I felt the class was too bad for 1st level, so I moved it to 1st level (which Fighters already get too, so I don’t think it is a problem).

2nd

At this level, they get Spellcasting and Holy Arrow, which is simply the Paladin’s Divine Smite, but for ranged weapon attacks. Usually that’s what half-casters get (and the fighting stlye already given at 1st level), so far so good for me.

3rd

They get their Sacred Oath. So far I have only made one choice for it, and I think presenting more than one would be bad either way. The Oath gives the following two options of Channel Divinity (similar to a Paladin having 2 choices):

  • +10 to hit after rolling (same as Guided Strike from Cleric)
  • Choice to make a 18 or 19 a critical hit. This is chosen after seeing the roll as well.

Note that this can only be done once per short rest. I particularly like the second option because Critical hits + Divine smites are one of the funniest moments for Paladin players. I am a little concerned that it might be too much, but with one use per short rest I don’t see it as game breaking. Some other subclasses of the Paladin, such as the Vengeance, can use their CD to get advantage on every attack, which will arguably lead to a critical hit eventually, as well. Anyway, this is the first feature that makes me not too sure.

For the spell list of the Oath, they are as follows:

  • 3rd: hunter’s mark, sanctuary. One good spell and one thematic/situational/decent spell. I may reflavor hunter’s mark for something more… Divine.
  • 5th: Misty step, magic weapon. Again, one good spell and one thematic/situational spell.
  • 9th: Haste, Dispel Magic. I am concerned about Haste here. It is a very good concentration option for a ranged class (which should not be attacked too often), and Dispel Magic is also a very decent spell (although situational).

4th level

They get ASI at 4th, 8th, 12th, 16th and 19th level, as usual. I will skip these.

5th level

Extra attack. Not much to say, this is mainly a martial class and they should get more attacks at 5th level.

6th level

Aura of Protection – but different from the Paladin one.

Beginning at 6th level, you can release an aura of protection against evil spells. Using an action, you create a 10 ft. aura that protects you and your allies from area of effect spells. When you or your allies are subjected to an area of effect that allows you to make a saving throw to take only half damage, you instead take no damage if you succeed on the saving throw, and only half damage if you fail.

You can use this feature once per long rest.

At 18th level, the range increases to 30 ft and you restore the feature once per short rest.

At 20th level, the range increases to 60 ft. and the aura is permanent.

Obviously, this is based on Evasion from Rogue, but also an aura-like from the Paladin. Giving an AoE permanent Evasion would obviously shadow the Rogue feature heavily, so I decided to make it cost an action to “activate” and only usable once per long rest. At the level they get it, it’s quite counter-intuitive, as it’s useful against AoE spells (say Fireball), but the range is so small they force their allies to be close (thus being more susceptible to Fireball).

In terms of Flavor, rather than an “evasion”, the aura makes the spell itself weaker (be it divine intervention or what else), which is the reason it works for any AoE, not only Dex-based saves.

The auras (this one and others that will follow) are my major concern on this class. Once per long rest may be too few uses for a 6th level feature, while a permanent aura would be obviously broken, and I am not sure how the middle behaves. Maybe “Charisma modifier” times per long rest would fit better?

7th level

This one is straight forward: extra 1d8 against Undead and Fiend. This is a nice feature against these enemies and so far I think they have been gaining very useful features for any combat, so I wanted to give them something more situational and thematic. At 7th level they get an extra spell slot as well (half-caster), so I don’t feel bad about giving them “only this”.

9th level

Originally, I was not going to give them anything, as they already get 3rd level spell slots and oath spells. But so far they have not gained any use for their reaction. They don’t get opportunity attacks because they are ranged, they don’t get Uncanny Dodge to halve damage, and if I am not mistaken, absolutely no spell in the Paladin list has a reaction casting time. So I gave them the ability to retreat

Beginning at 9th level, when an enemy gets within 10 ft. of you, you can use your reaction to move away from it up to half your speed. If the enemy is an Undead, you can move up to your full speed.

This is similar to a feature from a Rogue subclass in Xanathar.

So far, I am concerned that I might be giving them too many useful features, but I will talk about it in the comparison with other classes later.

10th level

Aura of Encouragement.

Beginning at 10th level, you can release an aura of encouragement towards your allies. Whenever an ally within 10 ft. (does not include you) fails an attack roll, ability check or saving throw, they may choose to re-roll. This feature can only be used once per short rest (for each ally using the feature).

At 18th level, the range of this aura increases to 30 ft. and the feature can be used twice per short rest.

At 20th level, the range of this aura increases to 60 ft. and the feature can be used once per minute.

I really like this feature. It’s a full support feature (note that it does not apply to yourself), and my hopes with this feature is to make the party go “THANK TYR WE HAVE THIS GUY HERE IN OUR PARTY”. It’s essentially a free reroll to each member of the party, which may save them in crucial times.

Again, I am concerned about this because it’s quite a new mechanic. Players will be rolling lots of dice and rerolling one of these rolls doesn’t seem concerning, but maybe I am missing some feat or other feature that this completely overshadows, or maybe this is not enough for a 10th level feature.

Compared to Aura of Courage, it certainly feels more generally useful.

I was also thinking about adding something along the lines of “Against undead or fiends, the first reroll is free”, going back to the theme of undead/fiend slayer, but I thought it may be too much.

So, the classes I feel should be considered for comparison are Paladin (duh), Fighter, Ranger and Rogue. I don’t see much point in comparing against full spellcasters, and I don’t think there is really much to compare between this and Barbarian, Monk or Warlock, as they fit completely different concepts, even though they are “martial” classes. These comparisons are my main notion of “balance”, as per How can I check to make sure my homebrew class is balanced compared to pre-existing classes? and especially this answer.

Paladin

Well, the whole idea is that they are conceptually different. While the Paladin is a melee tank frontliner, the Holy Archer is a ranged damage dealer with some utility. If the player wants the tank version, they pick paladin. If they want the ranged DDer, they pick the holy archer.

Fighter

Usually Ranged Fighters are not exactly optimal, but are certainly an option. Still, I would choose the Fighter if I want to make a feat-based character (let’s put Sharpshooter and Lucky in this build, shall we?), which is something the Holy Archer would struggle to do, as it requires a fair amount of attributes and gets the standard amount of ASIs. They also can be very competitive with Battle Maneuvers as a Battle Master.

On the other hand, the Holy Acher has nice spells, utility for the party and probably can outdamage a standard Fighter build (i.e. without Sharpshooter at least) with some uses of the Holy Arrow (which is stronger than battle maneuvers).

Overall, I think the Holy Archer is better than a ranged Fighter, but the latter still has its niche with feat-based builds and, even then, the Fighter class as a whole still has their use as melee fighters.

Rogue

So, here, I started by computing the damage output. So, basically, I compared a Rogue that is consistently getting Advantage (through his use of Bonus Action for Hiding) against the Holy Archer in a few uses of his spells:

  • For consistent damage against high AC monsters and helping the party, Bless.
  • For consistent damage alone, Hunter’s Mark.
  • For burst damage, Holy Arrow (Divine Smite).
  • Not using any spell slot.

In all levels, except for levels 5 and 6, the Rogue can deal more consistent damage than the Holy Archer, while obviously the Holy Archer can output a higher burst damage (especially by using his Channel Divinity to force a critical hit more often). At 5th and 6th, the Holy Archer outdamages the rogue due to the extra attack being considerably better than just +1d6 for the Sneak attack, however, at 7th level the Rogue comes back on top again.

However, in combat, the holy archer provides more utility to the party (either by bless, healing or the auras), which, in my opinion, make them on par. However, this utility is hard to quantify, which is one of the reasons I am asking for a review here.

Outside combat, the Rogue has more proficiencies and expertise, while the Holy Archer has Charisma as a primary stat and, well, spells. Again, I believe both are on par here.

But since spells are hard to quantify, this is the main comparison I would like to hear a review on.

Ranger

I will be fair: I would pick the holy archer above the ranger most of the time. But I don’t believe this is reason to say the archer is overpowered, rather, I believe the ranger to be underpowered in 5e. None of my groups would pick ranger to begin with (most of them tried at least once, and felt really bad and disappointed about it). In particular, I feel like giving this class Hunter’s Mark completely makes the Ranger useless, except if you go for Dual Wielding ranger, which then is conceptually different than the archer version.

Nonetheless, the Ranger has higher hit dice, can go for a dual wielding option (thus not being completely wasted) which is superior in lower levels, and can focus on Wisdom, thus arguably being more resilient in saving throws, more useful against surprise attacks and still has the ranger flavor which does not overlap with my homebrew in any way.

So, although I believe mechanically the Holy Archer outshines the Ranger, I would say the same for the Rogue and even for a Fighter.

As expected, this became a large question. I hope I could convey my line of thought and concerns and show that I have put some thought on it and, to the best of my abilities, ran through the number crunching of damage dealing in order to balance it. If the answers say that the class is ready for playtest, or that small changes are required in order to playtest it, I will be providing it as an option for a group that is starting CoS soon, otherwise, I will carefully try to understand the criticisms and may post a new version with the feedback I receive.

dnd 5e – If a Cleric uses “a sprinkling of holy water” in a spell, does the flask eventually get used up?

Supposing you are actually sprinkling a little bit of the water (since by the rules, it is sufficient for you to have the components in a pouch)…

Any rpg where the rule simulate some kind of reality have to draw the line of what they simulate somewhere. In modern D&D, simulation of moment-to-moment adventurous tasks is generally more detailed than longer-term consequences of said actions. Downtime and crafting rules are at a far higher level of abstraction, for example. We could say that maintaining equipment is generally abstracted away into lifestyle maintenance cost.

Likewise, characters can swing a sword or cast a cantrip as often as they get turns (or more); however, the rules do not say how long the characters can keep this up. If a character tries to continue doing this for hours on with no rest and end, the game master and the group are fully within their rights to say that there are consequences, such getting fatigue. The abstraction of the game does not handle such scenarios.

It is best to discuss such issues openly among the group, so that everyone can buy in into the decisions and rulings made. Otherwise it might feel like someone, maybe the game master, is arbitrarily adding restrictions into the game.

The game rules suggest the game master makes such rulings without consulting the group, and this can be best in some situation (dramatic situation, immature group but mature game master, players who enjoy character immersion a lot, players whose fun is spoiled by both discussing the rules and trying to act optimally within them). The following quote is from the basic rules and is part of the fundamental structure of the game:

The DM narrates the results of the adventurers’
actions. Describing the results often leads to another
decision point, which brings the flow of the game right
back to step 1.

The game assumes that the spell components are not spent, and whatever wear and time and minor issues equipment might have, the characters fix during downtime, or replace their things every now and then, etc. We can assume that replacing the sprinklings of holy water is a part of this.

The level of abstraction assumed by the rules works well when the characters occasionally are in civilized regions, have a few hours of downtime every now and then, and are not utterly broke. These are not restrictive conditions and probably also hold in your game.

Maybe your character or party is like a Robinson Crusoe on his island, or in some other situation of great scarcity. Maybe they use a small amount of holy water every now and then.

In this situation, the implicit assumption of the characters maintaining their equipment, including the hard-to-get parts of it, is no longer valid. Hence, if the character use holy water every now and then and have no means of creating them, the game master or the group is fully within the rules to declare that they run out at some point. The players have declared their actions and the game master declares consequences.

Due to reasons of realism and player buy-in, it is advisable to mention that half the water is now used, and now there are only a sprinklings left, and so on.

dnd 5e – What is a Paladin’s Holy Symbol for?

In addition to being, you know, a symbol of your beliefs and tenets which define your character as a Paladin.

The last subfeature of your Spellcasting feature reads:

Spellcasting Focus
You can use a holy symbol (see chapter 5, “Equipment”)
as a spellcasting focus for your paladin spells.

Said spellcasting focus can be used to provide non-costed, non-consumed material components for your spells. (See Chapter 10 of the PHB; Spellcasting > Casting a Spell.)

Excatly how it will work being engraved on your sword hilt you’ll have to ask you DM about (I personally would expect “yeah, that’s fine”. The issue is that the two options discussed by the rules are discrete items, or on a shield, but not on a weapon. The relevant rule for the DM:

To use the symbol (as a spellcasting focus), the caster must hold it
in hand, wear it visibly, or bear it on a shield.

Player’s Handbook, p. 153

If that’s valid as holding in your hand, or as a simple flavour mod from having it on your shield, it’s a no problem spellcasting focus for you.

The Holy Grail of Links – The Best Niche Edits Online – DR 20-30 for $65

The Holy Grail of Links – The Best Niche Edits Online – DR 20-30

Are you tired of buying the same old junk links, PBNs, Web 2.0., etc.? How’s that working out for you? See, I don’t ever use any of that when I’m building links to my personal or client’s websites. Yeah, they may move the needle, but they can be very risky. I like to build long term assets that will be paying me when I’m hanging out on my private island at 85 years old. That means, I only build links from real websites, which have good authority, are highly relevant, and have real traffic. There’s no secret that Google loves natural-looking, high authority relevant links. It’s not brain surgery.

Are your links natural looking?

Yes, they are placed within contextually relevant content and look very natural.

What makes this different from other niche edit services?

These are not hacked links, with junk text surrounding the link. These are whitelisted websites and we write 2-3 sentences of relevant content around the link.

Why don’t you use metrics like TF, CF, DA, Traffic, etc.?

Because it’s not necessary. With all of our testing, we’ve seen a correlation between our metrics and the way they move the SERPs. No need to get fancy over here.

What’s is DR (Domain Rating)?

Domain rating is aHrefs core authority metric. It gives you an estimate of how much authority the website is passing.

What should I use for Anchor Text?

It depends on the situation, but we’ve found lately, that using exact anchors is what is working very well.

What is your turn around time?

TAT is usually 21 days depending on the number of orders. There is a rush option for 7 day rush.

When will I start to see movement in my rankings?

Most websites see rankings increase within the first 2 weeks and then a gradual uptick thereafter. Every situation is different, as they sometimes take 30-45 days, or until Google runs a algoritm update.

What if the link doesn’t help my rankings?

If you don’t see a rank increase with these links (especially higher DR packages), there’s almost certainly an issue with your website; whether it be crap on-page, a penalty, or it could be that Google just doesn’t like you

.(tagsToTranslate)niche(t)edits(t)backlinks(t)authority(t)curated(t)links

If a Cleric uses holy water in a spell, does the flask eventually get used up?

e.g. the Bless spell calls for “a sprinkling of holy water”

Is the flask essentially unlimited for Bless, or is there a conversion of X sprinklings in 1 flask?

dnd 5e: Does Divinity of Devotion Paladin's channel holy weapon dispel darkness?

First of all, magic light sources dissipate darkness it is a function of that light source (and its text and spell level). For example light you can dispel it due to your own text (as long as it is released at an equal or higher level). There is no general rule for darknessheatsink

However, darkness just limit the non-magic light to illuminate the area:

… and the non-magical light cannot illuminate it.

and the effects (here the light) of a Channel Divinity is magical according to the description of Channel Divinities in general:

Your oath allows you to channel divine energy to fuel magical effects.

Player's Handbook P. 85

So the light can illuminate parts of the area, but it doesn't have the ability to dispel the spell.

Game recommendation – RPG with flexible holy trinity

Most RPGs work like this:

You are a wizard, but the moment you pick up a shield and a mace, you become a disabled wizard who cannot cast spells, so you are forced to play as a crystal cannon or a follower.

But why?
What prevents an intelligent intelligent creature from learning more than about something?

In real life, people can be smart, strong, fast, and a good artist because people generally have a long lifespan, enough to give them a chance to learn whatever skill they want.

Therefore, there is no point in a wizard being unable to be a tank, what prevents the wizard from learning defensive skills and taunts? Or what prevents a magician from changing his career during his life? Clearly, it is difficult to find a person in real life who has done a single job throughout his existence.

Or what if you want to be a "pyromancer" or "pyronym" and instead of shooting fireballs from a distance, they grab the face of your enemies and light the palm of your hand to turn your face into charcoal?

Are there any games with a completely free class system?