Tag: fox

Yes, it seems suspicious to me that they literally link you with everything, but this document that was written and signed by an 11000 scientist …….. But you know I went to college and studied this shit and I'm not worried and you know what I know about everything they taught me, the industries, the community and the credible sources.

Edit: I checked the link separately, there is nothing that really links to what they are signing. I mean, why is a neuroscientist something that should be considered worthy of opinion about the climate emergency, even if it is actually linked to what the * 4 article writers * wrote? Even one of the signatures was from a graduate, so not even a scientist. Jesus Christ, this is a disaster.

Edit: I looked through the signatures again, there are many teachers. You only need a master's degree to be a teacher, but you need a doctorate to be a scientist and have already used a graduate, so not a scientist, how many of these professors are scientists or not? Why is your profession more important than clarifying your qualification if you are really signing what the * four * boys are claiming? Look at the list of signatures, there is nothing that links them to anything they are really signing. the only thing that links it is the upper line inserted "for the article" no "from etc.". so they are not even giving you the original source of what these people are signing.

Edit: **** I couldn't concentrate enough to count how many PhD students signed, but there were lots. Which means they have not completed a doctorate, that is, they are not scientists. They even included laboratory technicians who are licensed, not doctors or scientists.

So up to 11,000 scientists signed and many are not scientists and many are not verified if they are scientists or not. yes credible **** me. what a mess.

Edit: In fact, I had to Google that **** to get the bioscience article that ** includes a separate link to these signatures that aren't really linked to anything.

Edit: I'm sorry, I miss telling there are 4 authors for this, but there was a lot of **** to read, so sorry.

Edit: the more I look at the list, it worsens. 11000 scientists sign is simply a lie. There is no real link to what they are signing too. If you are willing to lie directly about that and do not clarify the link, you are simply not a legitimate man.

Edit: Oh, you have a survey to quote, yes, that's totally final. You know I'll tell you the real shit. Each news source has its own bias and personal interest, so it is important to understand how to see if a new source in particular is credible or not. Choosing one medium of news over another will not prevent you from seeing a lot of biases and personal agenda junk.