Sharepoint online: multiple attachments in a single email in Flow

I have an html table where the data source is from the SharePoint image library.

When a user selects the check box, the row is selected and I want to send an email to the user with the value of the selected row along with the image attachment.

Here a user can select multiple rows, so he must send multiple attachments in an email.

For this approach, I created a flow that runs on the element created and modified.

Each time the user selects an item from the HTML table, I insert the data into another list with the item ID of the check boxes selected with comma-separated values.

Here is my flow screenshot. I was able to send a single email with a single attachment.

How can I send multiple attachments in a single email if the user has selected 2 items?

enter the description of the image here

enter the description of the image here

enter the description of the image here

Workflow: Attach the flow dynamically to the lists created by the site design

I have a site design, which adds a SharePoint list with some columns. I need the ability to select an item from that list / library, and click on Flows, and choose my flow and execute it.

The case I have is that the sites will be created by the users, and the design of the site will be applied to them, which creates those lists. Is there any way to attach the flow to those newly created lists so that the Flow appears in the Flow list and dynamically link it?

The best possible way to treat erectile dysfunction is Cialis 20mg

Cialis 20mg has modified the treatment of erectile dysfunction as much as the back because it reached the market. Cialis expands blood flow to the erectile organ by restricting the PDE-5 compound, which supplies many diligent erections. Cialis 20mg is especially prosperous if erectile dysfunction is the threshold due to inadequate blood flow to the sexual organ. Because most erection problems are attributable to the lack of blood flowing to the erectile organ, these blue pills are of great interest. It is important that Cialis is also useless if erectile dysfunction is attributable to totally different causes.
Visit here for similar products:
Cenforce 100
Kamagra 100mg
Fildena 100
Tadalafil 20mg
Super P Force
Cialis 20mg
Kamagra 100
Cenforce 200
Fildena 100
Cenforce 100
Cenforce 200
Cenforce 150
Cenforce 100
Vidalista 20
Cenforce 150
Vidalista 60
Vilitra 20mg

.

E-commerce: the best place to show a confirmation modality in a purchase flow

So, I am working in an e-commerce insurance and I would like information on where to show a confirmation modality. Let's say I'm on the summary page, and there is a "Change plan" button to choose another plan. I have options where to show the confirmation modal

Option 1. Once the user clicks on the "Change button", he is redirected to the Plans page. And right after the user clicks on the "I want this plan" button to confirm the change, show the modal.

Option 2. Displays the modal on the summary page just after the user clicks on the "Change plan" button. And then redirect the user to the plan page.

I think that option 1 works better since the modal is shown just before confirming the change, but option 2 may also work. Any comments are appreciated.

Prototype showing both options
https://www.figma.com/proto/nuRTOn8ZdMjGLkHrQXOZge/Untitled?node-id=6%3A38&viewport=-570%2C195%2C0.6362286806106567&scaling=min-zoom

sharepoint online: how to stop the current branch of actions but not end the entire flow

I have 4 sequences of actions that filter the selections:
1-10k
11-30k
30-99k
100k +

In my previous question, I wanted to avoid very nested elements, that has been achieved. Now, I face the problem in which I have 3 flows that are FALSE and one is TRUE, but I don't want to end the entire flow just because they are false.

So, I have an alternative solution of "Do Hasta" that will run infinitely, until the flow is forced to end.

I was wondering, are there any other recommended methods?

Another one that occurs to me is to send an email asking for an answer that never receives an answer. Nor are they ideal solutions, but they are enough. Are there official ways to do this? Something like, ending this "line of investigation" if the condition is false?

enter the description of the image here

Maximum flow with maximum flow at a specific edge

I am trying to solve the following problem:

We have a network flow. $ (V, E, c, s, t) $ and an advantage $ (u, v) $. We have to provide an algorithm that calculates the maximum flow that has maximum flow in $ (u, v) $ also.

The idea I had was to calculate the maximum flow and, on the residual graph, try to calculate a cycle that starts from $ s $ and go over the edge $ (u, v) $ and trying to increase $ (u, v) $& # 39; s while decreasing the flow of other edges. In other words, try to maximize the flow of $ (u, v) $ while preserving the maximum flow value. But I feel there is a simpler way.

Can someone point me in the right direction? Is my thinking correct? If not, how should I address the problem?

Any help is appreciated! Thank you!

mobile: OAuth authorization flow without external user agent for iOS application

Problem 1: avoid using a browser.

The first important thing to understand is that originally, OAuth2 was designed for access to third-party APIs, so security flows and models are designed to be used by a third party.

However, if applicable, it seems that OAuth2 tokens will only be used by your application.

The authorization code flow is, in fact, the recommended flow for native mobile applications by RFCs. The main security mechanisms established are:

  • Use of a redirect URI, to ensure that only the intended application receives the tokens
  • Use of an authorization token, to mitigate the risks of token interception between the browser and the native application (as opposed to the implicit flow, in which it is sent directly in the URI fragment)
  • Use of PKCE, for the same reasons.

However, with respect to the first point:
– Custom URL scheme: you cannot guarantee that another application on the device claims the custom URI scheme
– Universal URI: it implies a bad user interface and additional complexity

Using the authorization code flow has 3 benefits:
– Single Sign-On (SSO) with other native or web applications that use the same authentication service
– Allow third-party applications to use your authentication service (the OAuth2 form) without filtering user credentials (such as password) to the third-party application
– Some authentication schemes are only available in the browser, such as WebAuthn

However, if it is an application of the tour, and does not need SSO, and believes that the native UI is better, then my opinion is that it is acceptable from a security perspective. You can use the OAuth2 resource owner's Password credentials if you only need login / password authentication, otherwise you will need to extend this OAuth2 flow or implement it yourself.

Note that since you do not use redirect URIs at all and a mobile application is not able to keep a secret, well, secret (called public client in the terminology of OAuth2), you basically cannot guarantee that it is really your native application that calls your authentication endpoint.

Therefore, it has 2 solutions:
– Enter your request with a secret. For example, it could be a secret embedded in a QR code that is sent by letter to your customer
– Protect your authentication API against brute force attacks and apply strict acceleration limits. Also, do not allow weak passwords and / or request a second factor for more confidential data

But since it is your application, and you are unlikely to install a keylogger in your own application (!), I don't see any point to crack the PIN (by the way, weak password with low entropy). If your mobile operating system is hacked and the "virus" has access to the memory and code of your application, there is nothing you can do anyway.

Problem 2: keep the access token safe.

The best practice is to keep the update token in KeyChain and the access token In Memory. When the access token is lost or expires, just request a new one using the access token.

To mitigate the risks of stolen tokens for confidential data, you can:
* limit the lifespan of such tokens
* request a second factor for such tokens
* Cryptographically link them to the calling application. This mechanism is called Possession Test (PoP) and is surprisingly still experimental. You can find more information at: enter the link description here and enter the link description here

online sharepoint: simple flow to update a specified date / time field with the current time does not work – see screenshots

I have created a very simple workflow that must update any item that is created / modified with the current date and time, leaving all other fields the same.

However, the current time applies to ALL items in the list, rather than just the one that was created / modified.

Why not apply only to the element created / modified?

enter the description of the image here

Articles updated at the same time

forms: user flow for questions based on answers in the inspection application

I am working on a mobile application to help the technician perform inspections. They have many questions for each task, each question is about inspecting an item. When the response is positive, no further action is required (80% of cases).

enter the description of the image here

But when the answer is No, you have to identify the anomaly, so I show a new page with the anomaly option. I choose to represent it as letters because it needs to have a "on" and "off" statute.

enter the description of the image here

When the technician chooses an anomaly, it shows a new screen because we need additional information, my problem appears here. I can't create a classic step by step because the number and type of question will depend on the answers:

  1. First you must answer if "it solved", "it solved momentarily" or "you cannot solve for the moment" the anomaly.
  2. If the technician responds "fixed" or "momentarily fixed", we ask that you leave a comment to explain how you accomplished that.
  3. If the technician's response "cannot be solved at the moment", we have two additional questions: we have to identify the reason for this failure (choice in a list of 6 items) and the estimated repair time (choice in a list of 2 articles)

I don't know how to represent this user flow, this is my headache, but in the end the user must return to the anomalies screen, because he can add another anomaly with the same flow.

enter the description of the image here

Thanks for your help !

No target flow or funnel data

Hi, I set up a basic goal funnel. Put it on Friday but there is still no data in Goal Flow or Funnel Visualization.

Attached is an image of how I set my goal. Is there something really basic that I am missing?

Thanks in advance for any assistance.