virtual machines: what is the Google Cloud platform equivalent to a drop of digital ocean?

"Droplet" is a silly marketing speech for what is actually a virtual machine. It is probably best to avoid the term, even when referring to the Digital Ocean.

In fact, Google refers to them as virtual machines or instances of virtual machines, although they often abbreviate it as "VM."

terminology – Less significant bit (LSB) vs Little Endian – Are they equivalent anyway?

LSB (least significant bit) and MSB (most significant bit) apply only to the values ​​of an integer. The least significant bit is the bit with value 1, the second least significant bit is the bit with value 2, and so on.

"Little endian" and "Big endian" are just artifacts of the fact that the bytes of a number can be accessed individually as they are stored in memory. But if an integer is stored in 4 bytes, there are actually 24 different ways in which order these bytes could be stored in memory; Big Endian and Little Endian are just two of those 24.

With all this said, if you have been correctly understanding your teacher and have accurately reported what you said, then you are absolutely wrong. Actually, the multiple-choice answer "lower bit" no longer makes sense (it may not make sense, but we really like precision in CS). If it has 32 bits, 31 of them are "lower" than others, but ONE is the lowest. The least significant bit.

When "Little Endian" and "Big Endian" are abbreviated, they are abbreviated as LE and BE (for example, UTF-16 LE and UTF-16 BE).

dnd 5e – Is the phrase "within reach" equivalent to "within 5 feet" when it comes to escaping from a net?

I was reading about the Net element whose description says:

A creature can use its action to do a Force 10 DC test, freeing itself or another creature at your fingertips in a success

And I wasn't sure if something ever has a range greater than 5 feet.

I tried to consult the section on "Melee attacks":

Most creatures have a range of 5 feet and, therefore, can attack targets less than 5 feet from them when they perform a melee attack. Certain creatures (typically larger than Medium) have melee attacks with a range greater than 5 feet, as noted in their descriptions.

But he doesn't really say that his reach it increases, just that some attacks of them have greater reach.
I thought that ownership of the Reach weapon might help, but it says:

This weapon adds 5 feet at your fingertips when you attack with that, as well as determining its scope for opportunity attacks with it.

It only increases its range for two specific things, the attacks that use it and the range for attacks of opportunity.

Is there a time when the Network (and also hunting traps and quicksand) that has the phrase "within reach" is different from the phrase "less than 5 feet"?

pathfinder 1e – Am I valuing this equivalent of Efficient Quiver correctly?

Then, I will soon play an assistant in a friend's friend search game. I wanted to make a custom magic item, similar to Efficient Quiver. At that time I had only scanned the Efficient Quivers skills and assumed that it only worked with arrows and bows. So I looked for the rules of creating custom magic items to determine the price of DC and gold to do what is essentially a golf bag for my Metamagic rods that carries many of them.

My guess based on reading the rules; the DC is 5 + the Launcher Level for the item (which I assume is the Launcher Level of my character, in this case 12) and, therefore, the DC for this would be 17. Now we go to the cost, as determined by the formulas found in the "Table: Estimation of the values ​​of the gold pieces of the magic objects", since this new magic object is based on the Efficient Quiver, using the same spell (Secret Chest: Wizard / Sorc 5) and the craftsman's caster level (12), as The effect I want is a continuous effect, the cost formula is as follows: (Spell level × caster level × 2,000 gp squared)

Now I did the calculations, and if I am following PEMDAS correctly, then my mathematical process is as follows

5 (spell level) x 12 (caster level) = 60

60 x 2000gp = 120,000

120,000two = 14 400 000 000gp

This article, which is almost identical to the Efficient Quiver, is 8 million times the price of the item in question.

Am I doing math wrong? Is the formula an error that received frequent questions or errata? Because then this object would be impossible to manufacture.

at.algebraic topology – Are CW finite complexes and finite simplicity sets equivalent?

It is well known that for any finite CW complex $ K $ a finite simplicity set whose geometric realization is equivalent to $ K $. But the construction is not strictly functional.

Suppose we have a diagram of CW finite complexes. Can you always construct a diagram of finite simple assemblies, whose geometric realization is connected to the original diagram by means of a zig-zag of weak natural equivalences?

One can ask a similar question in a more general context than the category of spaces. Suppose we have a $ infty $-category $ math C $. Suppose $ A $ it is a collection of objects (say compact) of $ math C $. Leave $ CW ^ f (A) $ be the category of finite cellular objects generated by $ A $. More or less, $ CW ^ f (A) $ it consists of objects that can be constructed as a finite homotopy colimit of objects of $ A $. I'm leaving the definition of $ CW ^ f (A) $ A little vague: I am happy to use any reasonable notion. Leave $ SS ^ f (A) $ be the category of simplicity objects in $ math C $ that in each simplicial degree there is a finite sum of elements of $ A $, and are degenerated above some dimension. The geometric realization gives a functor $ SS ^ f (A) a CW ^ f (A) $. Now we have an obvious generalization of the question:

Suppose we have a diagram in $ CW ^ f (A) $. Can we find a diagram in $ SS ^ f (A) $ Whose geometric realization is (weakly) equivalent to it? If it is not true in general, is there a reasonable set of sufficient assumptions?

Can anyone show me how they are equivalent?

There is a line in an answer to a question that matches

$ e ^ { frac {-3 pi {i}} {4}} $ =$ -e ^ { frac { pi {i}} {4}} $

could someone explain how they are equivalent

Storage: Is there any existing open source utility / equivalent to counterfeit FCP, that is, SCS over FC packages?

I am looking for some simple tool, preferably open source, that can generate / falsify SCSI over FC, that is, FCP packages.

I am aware of high-end products such as SANblaze, I was wondering if there is something lighter, and preferably an open source tool that can achieve the same.

house rules: What would be the Fate / Fudge equivalent of the stunt mechanics of the AGE System?

As you know, the AGE system (Dragon Age RPG, Fantasy Age RPG, etc.) has a mechanism to generate stunts based on the player's launch double.

If you are not familiar with the concept, the system has a 3d6 pool mechanic where one of its dice is called "The Dragon Die" or "The Stunt Die" (which is simply a normal d6 in a different color).

Then rolling double I would be throwing a second die with the same number as the die out of color (for example: (6), (6), (3) or (4), (2), (4) or even (3), (3), (3)).
In the game, this allows you to use the number on the colored dice as points to buy stunts, which are special moves that you can perform.

So, without necessarily changing the colors of the dice or using any other dice other than just Vanilla Fudge / Fate, how could I reproduce this type of mechanics? (For now, just ignore the mechanics of buying points as the Fudge / Fate die is limited. Let's assume when "double" it happens that it will generate a single point).

Is there an equivalent of Lightroom profiles in Capture One?

I am trying to decide between investing in Lightroom or Capture One.

further presets (which are equivalent to Capture one styles) Lightroom also has profiles that the slider positions do not change and, therefore, can be applied at any point in the workflow. Is there something like that in Capture One?

dnd 5e: What is mechanically equivalent to Thieves & # 39; Cant?

There are none

As it is a method of communication, can it be taken as a language?

No Thieves & # 39; Cant is a class feature, not a language.

Is it mechanically equivalent to something?

No Thieves & # 39; Cant is a unique class feature. Even spells like Comprehend Languages ​​do not allow you to understand Thieves & # 39; Cant.

Is there any other rule mechanics, p. background, which could grant Thieves & # 39; Cant?

No With DM approval, only custom funds or home-made class archetypes can grant Thieves & # 39; Qty. There are no "official" ways to get this feature other than to raise a level in Rogue.

As for knowing, Thieves & # 39; Cant is a steganography. It allows you to hide a secret message in your convenient speech. In other words, it is the ability to hide secret messages in any language you are currently speaking (thanks @guildsbounty).

A DM can allow Thieves & # 39; Cant as usual background function. See page 125 of PHB "Customizing a background":

If you cannot find a function that matches the desired background, work with your DM to create a