dnd 5e – What are the unintended or dangerous consequences of allowing spells that attack and harm creatures to also target and damage corpses?

There have been many questions about corpses and creatures, as here where it is argued that a dead creature is a creature, here where the opposite is argued and where resuscitating an animated corpse is in the air.

It has already been discussed here what happens when spells are allowed to the target objects, and although corpses would be included in that question, I would like to ask whether treating the corpses as particular creatures causes negative or unwanted side effects, since there are many spells that normally only works with living creatures, but now also works with corpses (dead creatures).

dnd 5e – What are the unintended or dangerous consequences of allowing spells that attack and damage creatures to also point and damage objects?

There are no disastrous side effects in allowing damaging spells that cause an appropriate type of damage to also damage objects, as appropriate for their effects. This GM does it regularly and it has not been a problem. This GM has not allowed the psychic damage to damage mundane objects, in general, but otherwise has a fairly extensive experience with such a house rule.

When such a rule is implemented, it is usually important to decide in advance what types of materials, in general, are vulnerable to what types of energy types. For example, this GM generally rules that metal objects receive 1/4 damage from fire attacks, after damage reduction, while wooden objects are fired and receive damage exta 1-2 d6 per turn until that are destroyed. However, even without rules like these, nothing in the system will be broken, the damage caused by the energy attacks will only be a bit strange, and fighting near the treasure will be a problem, even when the players initially expect it not to be. (e.g Cone of cold destroying a lot of coins).

[ Politics ] Open question: If Democrats want to ban guns because they are dangerous, why not ban tornadoes too?

[ Politics ] Open question: If Democrats want to ban guns because they are dangerous, why not ban tornadoes too? .

Greed is very dangerous for currency trading, do you agree? – Discussions and Help

I agree with you. Greed is very dangerous for the merchant. Therefore, it is necessary to control greed in currency trading. By controlling greed, we can avoid over lots. That way, our trade will last much longer. Many traders fail because they can not control their greed.

tls – Does the Man-in-the-Midlle attack (because there are no HSTS) on a static website is dangerous?

Suppose we have example.com without HSTS header, it is a static website with no login / subscription option. It only has information and a download option to a program that they did.

With Man in the middle you could see the traffic (but can not steal credentials, for example), XSS and some more attacks, but can it be considered a real security vulnerability? Can a hacker change the download file of the page before the victim clicks on it? What other complex attacks can a hacker achieve on example.com with Mitm's attack?

The most dangerous animals …?

Hello friends,

Please tell me, which country has the most dangerous animals …?

Exploits: How many times is dangerous Sorcery applied when the spell is cast several times for damage?

I'm confused as to the interaction between Dangerous witchcraft and spells like Magical missiles.

Dangerous sorcery:
When you cast a non-cantrip spell that inflicts damage and does not have a duration, you gain a conditional bonus to that spell's damage equal to the level of that spell.


Magic missile:
You send a dart of force towards a creature that you can see. Hit automatically and inflicts 1d4 + 1 force damage. When casting this spell, you can increase the throw by a material throw action, a somatic throw action, or both. For each component you add, increase the number of missiles you shoot in one. You choose the target for each missile individually.

Assuming a first level Sorcerer, with the Dangerous Sorcery feat, launching a magical Missile, the damage would be:

Number of missiles x (1d4 + 1) + 1 (Dangerous wizardry) // (3d4 + 3 + 1)

or

Number of missiles x (1d4 + 1 + 1 (Dangerous wizardry)) // (3d4 + 3 + 3)

TL; DR: Is Hazardous Sorcery applied once for the entire spell, or each time a spell is cast?

1: I analyzed the issue (simple search search for exact search of google search) but the answers I found are old or confusing / based on opinions

Exploits: How many times is dangerous witchcraft applied when the spell is cast several times for damage?

I'm confused about the interaction between Dangerous Sorcery and spells like Magic Missiles.

Dangerous sorcery:
When you cast a non-cantrip spell that inflicts damage and does not have a duration, you gain a conditional bonus to that spell's damage equal to the level of that spell.


Magic missile:
You send a dart of force towards a creature that you can see. Hit automatically and inflicts 1d4 + 1 force damage. When casting this spell, you can increase the throw by a material throw action, a somatic throw action, or both. For each component you add, increase the number of missiles you shoot in one. You choose the target for each missile individually.

Assuming a first level Sorcerer, with the Dangerous Sorcery feat, launching a magical Missile, the damage would be:

Number of missiles x (1d4 + 1) + 1 (Dangerous wizardry) // (3d4 + 3 + 1)

OR

Number of missiles x (1d4 + 1 + 1 (Dangerous wizardry) // (3d4 + 3 + 3)

TLDR: Is the dangerous Sorcery applied once by the entire spell, or each time a spell is cast?

1: I looked at the matter (simple search exact search of google), but the answers I found are old or confusing / based on opinions

How dangerous is the XSS

I am a software engineer and I have been watching many videos about XSS. But I do not understand why it is dangerous if it runs on the client side and does not run on the server side that contains the databases and many important files. Can someone please help me to help you?

Forex is a very dangerous business to do. – Discussions and Help

Forex is a very dangerous business to do. The merchant will not make a profit in every trade. The merchant only needs patient and commercial skill. Brokers often give their merchants this confidence and market their platform. I am negotiating with AAFX. He gave me this positive attitude and gave me a bonus for my loss. It also gave me a leverage of 1: 2000.