## Free Control Panel for VPS

Hi folks!
What is the best free/open-source control panel to manage a VPS?

I found these:
– Aapanel (aapanel.com)
– Cipi (cipi.sh)

## oracle grid control – How to Check GridDB performance?

By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy.

## real analysis – Do we have full control the oscillation of a function by modifying it on a small set?

Definitions and some motivation:

Let $$mathcal B$$ be the set of bounded measurable functions from $$(0, 1)$$ to $$mathbb R$$. Denote by $$mathcal N$$ the set of measurable subsets of $$(0, 1)$$ with Lebesgue measure $$0$$.

Given a function $$f in mathcal B$$, define the function $$mathcal Of$$ by

$$mathcal Of(x) := inf_{N in mathcal N} lim_{delta to 0} sup_{y, z in B_delta (x) setminus N} |f(y) – f(z)|$$.

Thanks to Lusin’s theorem, we know that we can modify $$f$$ on an arbitrarily small set and get a continuous function, and so we force the oscillation to be $$0$$ everywhere. But can we force it to be whatever we want?

Question:

Does there exist, for any $$f, g in mathcal B$$ and $$epsilon, varepsilon > 0$$, a function $$f’ in mathcal B$$ such that the following conditions are satisfied?

i) $$f = f’$$ everywhere except for a set of measure at most $$epsilon$$.

ii) $$Of’ = Og$$ everywhere.

iii) $$int_{(0, 1)} |f’ – f’| dmu < int_{(0, 1)} |Of – Og| dmu + epsilon$$

Note: All functions are genuine functions and not equivalence classes modulo null sets of such.

## version control – Strategies to organize multiple projects which may reference each other and managed by different teams in Git?

First actually I don’t think Git is a specific involved tool here, it can be any other Source/Version Control tool (TFS, SVN, …). The point here is how to deal with the scenario in which I have multiple projects, each project may reference other projects but managed by different teams.

If we can include all the referenced projects in a solution, it can be easy for debugging & getting up-to-date. However currently we just add references by `dll`. That means the referenced projects are not referenced directly but built into dll files first and added as references to the projects that need them. This way is not very good especially when we have to commit the dll files which will make the tracked file become larger and larger (e.g: the project code could be several MBs in size but may actually end up in more than several GBs in size). That’s just one of disadvantages. It can be harder when debugging and to ensure that the referenced projects are up-to-date (at least to some working & stable version).

My team has thought of creating a private nuget packages source where we can publish all the referenced project dlls and they can be installed (by a specific version) into any other projects that need them. It sounds promising but I’m not so sure about how easy it can be when debugging (so that it’s just like referencing the source code directly).

Could you please share some thoughts or directions to deal with this scenario of managing multiple projects? Thanks!

## permissions – Full control, Limited Access given through a group where the user does not exist?

I have a SharePoint site where, when searching for a user at site level (using check permissions) it comes back saying the user has “Full control, limited access – Given through the ‘Site Name’ Owners Group.

However, the user is not an Owner of the site and when I click into the Owners group, they are not listed in there either.

How is this user being provided with access at site level from the specified group when they don’t appear to be in that group and how would I go about visualising and removing these user permissions?

I should add that when I click the “There are limited access users on this site. Users may have limited access if an item or document under the site has been shared with them. Show users”. It doesn’t show any additional users, but instead replaces ‘Full Control’ with ‘Full Control, Limited Access’ against the Site Owners group.

## settings – Is it possible to get finer volume control on a rooted Lenovo M8 tab (HTC Sense UI)?

There’s a popular mod to get finer volume control on a device by adding the property `ro.config.media_vol_steps to /system/etc/prop.default` (android 10) and assigning your prefered steps value, ie ‘`= 30`‘ but on my device this results in multiple volume ranges divisible by 15.
Apparently this affects the HTC UI sense as well.

For example if I assign the value 37 to the above property (I do get 37 steps) but when I test by playing something on spotify and increase volume using the buttons I get:

step 0 = mute

step 15 = max volume

step 16 = mute

step 30 = max volume

step 31 = mute

step 37 = volume 6

Anything below 15 works as expected.
The same happens if you’ve rooted with Magisk and do it via prop editor or any other editor.

I’ve been trying to find a solution for this for months with no success hence up the creek with no paddle.

I have coding abilities but for me X86 assembly is easier than than understanding the various tool chains / libraries / compilers required to debug an Android device.

I would like to at least know where in the architecture I should be focusing on.

• Is it vendor or system related?

• A persistent setting?

• Is the setting pre compiled so would need custom ROM ie a library file change (.so)
I beleive it must be solvable just hoped I could get at least a hypothetical view of the problem from someone more familiar with the source of Android!

You can get fine volume control from the GUI (swipe down) how can this be mapped to Volume up / Volume down?

PS: I should mention I don’t have TWRP as it’s not available for this device.

I can now add that installing EdXposed framework along with GravityBox (version Q) also results in the same problem! The modded code above is not found in the prop.default file even tho I have the same broken functionality, same with magisk modules.

Seems Xposed / gravityBox / magisk are the most powerful tools available to developers for stock software. Im sure there are experts out there that could build a custom software with a simple volume control patch for this device so guess we’ll just have to wait. Thanks

## version control – What is the **difference** between git-repo and meta tools in the context of multiple git source code repositories?

Regarding the tools repo and meta, in the context of multiple git source code repositories, what is the difference ?

Or do they basically do the same thing?

An article back in 2012 says: “Repo is a tool created by Google (…) works by providing a way to check out multiple projects (Git repositories) (…) provides a way to submit an atomic changeset that includes changes to multiple different projects. (…)” and https://github.com/mateodelnorte/meta says: meta is a tool for managing multi-project systems and libraries. It answers the conundrum of choosing between a mono repo or many repos by saying “both”, with a meta repo! (…) letting you execute them against some or all of the repos in your solution at once

EDIT : My earlier attempt to ask this was deleted for being of type “find or recommend tools… “. Now I am not here now asking for a recommendation, I am just asking are there any concrete difference between them! Thanks!

## Is it possible to get finer volume control on a rooted Lenovo M8 tab?

Theres a popular mod to get finer volume control on a device by adding the property ro.config.media_vol_steps to /system/etc/prop.default (android 10) and assigning your prefered steps value, ie ‘= 30’ but on my device this results in multiple volume ranges devisable by 15.
Apparently this affects the HTC UI sense as well.
For example if I assign the value 37 to the above property (I do get 37 steps) but when I test by playing something on spotify and increase volume using the buttons I get –

step 0 = mute
step 15 = max volume
step16 = mute
step 30 = max volume
step 31 = mute
step 37 = volume 6

Anything below 15 works as expected.
The same happens if you’ve rooted with Magisk and do it via prop editor or any other editor.
Iv been trying to find a solution for this for months with no success hence up the creek with no paddle.

I have coding abilities but for me X86 assembly is easier than than understanding the various tool chains / libraries / compilers required to debug an Android device.
Id like to at least know where in the architecture I should be focusing on.

Is it vendor or system related?
A persistant setting?
Is the setting pre compiled so would need custom ROM ie a library file change (.so)
I beleive it must be solvable just hoped I could get at least a hyperthetical view of the problem from someone more familiar with the sourcery of Android!
You can get fine volume control from the GUI (swipe down) how can this be mapped to Volume_key_up / volume_key_down ?
Got a feeling this question is gonna get slated, at least be constructive and Ill do my best to edit the question so it DOES help others.
Thanks. ☮️

## power automate – How to design a flow which can control other independent flows without building child-parent relation

How can we in MS flow control the execution of other flows?
To be more specific:
How can we do the followings in a flow:

``````1 -Check the status of other flows? e,g, running, idle
2- If they are running, for how long they are running?
3- Turn the other flows on or off?
4-a bit greedy, but can we check the value of a variable in other flows if they are in a running state? (e.g. Can we check the variable 'var_a' of flow B which is in the running state while we are in flow A (no child-parent relation between these flows)?
``````

estoy usando laravel 8, Hyn (tenant) y spatie permissions.

Tengo todo funcionando pero tengo un pequeño detalle que no logro como hacerlo.

Todos los usuarios estan en la misma base de datos… los administradores tambien, pero tienen un campo agregado que es adminuuid donde tienen un codigo ejemplo: 09a8dsa03

cada subdominio tiene un uuid… y necesito que al ingresar a sub1.dominio.com/admin solo pueda iniciar sesión quien tenga el 09a8dsa03 en el uuid… y el que tenga el as2398a solo pueda entrar a sub2.dominio.com/admin

si el usuario del sub2 entra al del sub1 pues que sea redirigido al sub1…

yo de momento detecto el uuid con esto:

``````\$website   = app(HynTenancyEnvironment::class)->website();

\$websiteId = \$website->uuid;
``````

en routes tengo esto donde solamente pueden entrar los administradores… pero el problema es que todos los administradores pueden entrar al panel de todos los subdominios.

``````Route::group(('middleware' =>('auth:sanctum', 'role:Admin')), function () {