8 – How do I display in a view, the opposite of what is checked / true?

So I have a Table that displays a list of nutritional items that have the name of the item, the vitamins and minerals it contains.

enter image description here

My goal is to display the items NOT checked (or true), so I can get a list of vitamins and minerals that I am missing in someone’s diet. So as for the example in above, this table is currently showing what minerals and vitamins the product contains. It instead should display vitamins and minerals that are not on the list or missing.

So the way it would work is it shows Blue berries has vitamin C, K, so therefor, your missing vitamins A, B1-12, D, E, ect.

luggage – PVC pipes in checked baggage

by looking at the tsa tag, it seems that you are traveling to USA. The TSA guidelines
does not mention anything regarding PVC pipes so the best option is to ask them directly.

For items not listed here, simply snap a picture or send a question to AskTSA on Facebook Messenger or Twitter. We look forward to answering your questions, from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. ET weekdays; 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. weekends/holidays.

Display checked radio button custom option value in product detail page Magento2

Below are custom option of Radio Button Type. How to Display <span> value under the <label> when customer checked Radio button using Jquery? Here All class are dynamic.

As per the below code I want to show red if customer click on first radio and blue if customer click on 2nd radio button

<div class="options-list nested" id="options-1-list">
      <input type="radio" class="radio-product-custom-option" name="options[1]" id="options_1_2" value="1" data-selector="options[1]" price="10" aria-required="true">
      <label class="label" for="options_1_2">
      <input type="radio" class="radio-product-custom-option" name="options[1]" id="options_1_3" value="2" data-selector="options[1]" price="20" aria-required="true">
      <label class="label" for="options_1_3">

Load full MenuLinkTree regardless of "expanded" checked

When loading a menu, for example using:

$tree = Drupal::menuTree()->load('my-menu-name', new MenuTreeParameters());

Items whose parent does not have the "Expanded" checkbox set in the menu are skipped. Is there a way to load these regardless?

git – Can’t merge branch checked out from master to test branch

We have two branches master and test branch. Test branch is slightly different than master because of some features that were added to test but not master. Whenever I create a new branch from master let’s say MDW-1 and make my changes there and try to merge it in test, it can’t merge without conflict because it tries to remove all the features from test branch that are not in master branch. So the temporary solution right now is to checkout test-MDW-1 from test branch and cherry pick changes from MDW-1 to test-MDW-1. This is redundancy because we have two create two branches for same changes. What would be the solution for this? This was not the case a few days back. I could easily merge the branch checked out from master into test branch. This arose after I reverted a pull request from master branch.

entities – FileField Path only updates when “Retroactive update” checked and Internationalisation D9

Developing on D 9.1.3 and File (Field) Paths Version: 8.x-1.0-beta, Pathauto

Two questions:

1, I am using FileField Path to get Tokens (entity field product taxonomy) in File Path settings and it only applies when using “Retroactive update” field checked. Path are then created successfully, however on new product creation, path are not applied. Any areas to check why this would happen?


2, On the above the path created looks something like this:
I have tried to exclude folders created “product-category”, a, and wording hreflangengame-toys via Pathauto, but no success.

The goal is to have the path from a Taxonomy entity reference created to something like this:

Any hints at what to poke at?

Thanks much.

2013 – SharePoint CAML not returning checked out files

I have a CAML query to find documents by name within a document library, however, the checked out (drafts) documents are not found by the below query (ran with high privilege):

Spquery query = new Spquery(){
RowLimit = 1,
Query = "<WHERE><EQ> <FieldRef Name='FileLeafRef'/><Value Type='Text'>file_name.txt</Value> </WHERE></EQ>

What I am missing, how can I include the checked out items ?

air travel – Flying with a desktop computer (as checked luggage)

I personally would take some precautions. First of all, make a backup of your data. Leave on in your home and take another one with you so that you can use it in your destination place. Then when transporting a desktop computer, the most fragile part is almost always the hard disk drive. So I would dismount it if possible and take it into your cabin luggage. You could also do this for other sensible parts like for example other drives, the processor, or the RAM bars. This I would pack into anti-static bags and take it into the cabin.

The tower itself you can put into protected pc transporting bags like this one. This bag will be checked so that you can’t smuggle and weapons or drugs. But you shouldn’t normally fear that this will damage your computer.

And last but not least, you could also think about sending your computer with a carrier. I quote this from a message board:

Send it via a Secured Carrier, RPS(Royal Packaging Service), Which
Delivers Things in the most pristine state Possible. Door to door
Service, White glove care. But i warn you, Its pricey. 15lb =

language design – Why do “checked exceptions”, i.e., “value-or-error return values”, work well in Rust and Go but not in Java?

From a scientific point of view, checked exceptions can be seen as alternative return values, e.g.

Exactly. They can be seen that way, and they should be but they aren’t.

Using an Error type like is common in Rust, Elm, Haskell, and in some sub-communities in Scala or a special error value as in Go is just an alternative return value indicated in the type system. A checked exception is like an alternative return value, but it doesn’t use the normal way of returning values, it is a completely separate, very different way of “returning values”. It also sits outside of the type system, and bolts on a completely separate “checked exception” system onto the type system.

But most importantly, it is not just an alternative return value, it is also an alternative control flow.

Another problem with the specific way checked exceptions are implemented in Java, is that they are anti-modular. That is, however, not a fundamental problem of checked exceptions, unlike the ones I mentioned above. There is an idea of Modular Anchored Exceptions, for example, where you can specify something like

int foo() throws like bar { return bar(); }

And you don’t have to know (and leak!) which precise exceptions bar can throw. You can even do something like throws like bar except ArrayOutOfBoundsException when you are handling some errors yourself.

brexit – Would British citizens need to get their passport checked at the Ryanair visa desk from Jan 1st 2021?

For entry into the Schengen Area (not within the Common Travel Area), British citizens will be treated as 3 Country nationals.

A entry/exit stamp will be placed in their passport to enforce the 90/180 days rule.

An exception will be made for those presently (2020) inside the Schengen Area. The 90/180 day clock will start on the 2021-01-01, so the lack of an entry stamp will not automatically assume an overstay.

Should, for any reason, no stamp upon entry be given it is advised to retain some proof of date of entry (ticket etc.) to avoid complications when leaving.

The same is true for (non-Irish) EU Citizens when entering the United Kingdom, especially when arriving from the Republic of Ireland. At present it is not clear how the date of entry will be noted for those travelling with only an ID (which will still be possible until 2021-10-01), afterwhich a passport is required for non-resident EU Citizens who are not Irish.

As to how private corporations, who will be held responsible for transporting persons without the proper paperwork, will deal with this is their affair. Assume they will refuse to allow you to board if you don’t fulfill their conditions.