If my product is currently at EAL4, what is the process to get to EAL7? What additional paperwork or requirements would I need to complete?
I’m curious if there have been any technical evaluations of the vulnerabilities of cryptocurrencies that utilize more than one proof of work algorithm – for instance, myriadcoin or huntercoin.
Myriadcoin uses five different PoW algorithms, with different algorithms targeted towards different hardware, so that people are able to mine with ASICs, GPUs, and CPUs. The idea is that this will make it more difficult to centralize mining and harder gain control of 51% of the hashing power, while also making mining more accessible to as many people as possible.
I’m wondering if there are any potentially unintended consequences to this that maybe some folks have already identified.
The data model is given & needed select queries for the given questions asked in the title .
I am trying to modify a woocommerce website and I have very little HTML/CSS training. Most of what I’ve learned has come from trial and error, some online tutorials, playing around with the developer console in Chrome, etc….
I’m trying to add an image border to the top of a page header right before an area called
tg-container. I was able to put one below it, using an existing class, whose info I didn’t need to see. Can it be done with the Additional CSS interface built into the theme or do I have to go into the style.css and html to create the boarder? I know the benefit of the Additional CSS interface is having no need to edit the theme files directly whenever the theme is updated.
Example Page with border – accessible only after bypass page is visited
IMAGE: Example page with Chrome Developer Console open and showing code for area
I need to create a Many to Many relationship and understand the need for an intermediate table to act as the link between the two. The understanding I have is the Group of ID’s in the intermediate table should be unique to not duplicate data; is this correct?
The DB that I am designing is for a deck of cards.
I have two tables: decks and cards. The intermediary table is deck_cards.
The issue I am facing is: a deck can contain many cards but can also contain more than one of the same card.
Below is a screen shot of my current Schema. I am currently storing an additional bit of data in the column amount in the deck_cards table for a given relationship. Is this the appropriate way to approach this situation? Or, is there another intermediary table that is needed to be created?
In general, no. Bitcoin Core and other available node software do not have any publicly accessible interface other than the P2P interface.
There are a few modified node software available to publicly expose statistics about the node. Some people may choose to install those software and would have information about their node exposed.
We are looking into what is considered as a ‘top’ vacation rental property and how we can lets the users know this. We have a good idea of a criteria that goes into this.
We have also had some findings which summaries that putting another badge on a property listing won’t be all that impactful or trustworthy. Not to mention there is enough info already on the listings/search results page that we have (image, price, title etc.)
Im leaning towards a more invisible design – whenever a user goes to a listings/search results page, the first lot a results should already have the ‘top property’ criteria IN ADDITION to the search criteria they set. The only exception would be if it limits the search results too much.
Example to my hypothesis
User inputs criteria in the searchbox (destination, dates, guests) —>
User is directed to results page based on their criteria —>
Search filter ALSO includes pre selected options such as wifi included, free cancellation option etc.
- How much of a negative impact would it be if we provided a more
pre-filtered results list?
- Is there any research to back this up or suggest another
Hope that makes sense 🙂
i’am working on centos 7 i already exported my Active directory database from windows server 2012 now i need to import it on my new solution OpenLdap !
I try to import my file :
ldapmodify -Y EXTERNAL -H ldapi:/// -f exportuser.ldf
i got an error :
SASL/EXTERNAL authentication started
SASL username: gidNumber=0+uidNumber=0,cn=peercred,cn=external,cn=auth
SASL SSF: 0
adding new entry “dc=sis,dc=infra”
ldap_add: Invalid syntax (21)
additional info: objectClass: value #2 invalid per syntax
This is a part of my Ldif file
Some help please
If I build a recursive DNS server for me and my friends, I believe that means we now rely entirely on its results and ability to resolve any query.
In that case, can the recursive DNS server remove the ADDITIONAL and AUTHORITY sections in the response it returns?
I guess, as a consumer that entirely rely on this recursive DNS server, I have no use of those sections. Is that a correct statement?
The spike growth effect must be within the druid grove area; it’s unclear whether it must be entirely within the area
The druid grove spell includes a few potentially helpful lines (emphasis mine):
(…) The area can be as small as a 30-foot cube or as large as a 90-foot cube. (…)
(…) The spell creates the following effects within the area. (…)
(…) A dispel magic cast on the area, if successful, removes only one of the following effects, not the entire area. (…)
(…) You can place your choice of one of the following magical effects within the warded area: (…)
From the first quote we can conclude that “the area” refers to the actual grove itself not the various effects of the spell. Thus we know that the effects (including the additional spell effects) are created within the area. We also know from the fourth quote that these effects are placed within the area. What we do not know is whether “the effect” means the point-of-origin or the entire effect. I could see a GM using either interpretation.
My own personal thoughts
If I tell you to put a book on the table and you have the book teetering off the edge, I will smile, say “really?”, and move the book to be actually on the table.
While the spike growth might be inside the druid grove it also goes outside the grove. It would be meeting a technical requirement because the spell did not include the word “entirely” but I wouldn’t allow it to be placed in such a way.